esc wrote to Gamgee <=-
Following up to our previous conversation about Lenovo/System76...
Well, I was drooling excessively while looking at that System76 website, and finally the wife felt sorry for me and told me to proceed. ;-)
Awesome! And those specs are nasty, this is gonna be a great
computer.
What OS are you planning to run? Are you going to do gaming
stuff?
Let me know how it goes! I'm typing this from my System76 Oryx
Pro 10 as we speak :P It runs Baldur's Gate 3 and Grand Theft
Auto V well, which is really all I need hehe. Oh, and the
Civilization games as well...
I'm sure you'll be pleased. Congrats on the acquisition :)
It'll be running Slackware Linux, no doubt about that. It's pretty much all I use, although I have a mini-computer here running MX Linux which I
like pretty well. I may break down and drop a Windows (7) partition on this one for some gaming, as well. Can't wait to get it!
It'll be running Slackware Linux, no doubt about that. It's pretty much all I use, although I have a mini-computer here running MX Linux which
Do you think it could run on a raspberry pi?
candycane wrote to Gamgee <=-
Re: Re: Intel NUCs
By: Gamgee to esc on Mon Aug 21 2023 07:27 am
It'll be running Slackware Linux, no doubt about that. It's pretty much all I use, although I have a mini-computer here running MX Linux which I
Do you think it could run on a raspberry pi?
It'll be running Slackware Linux, no doubt about that. It's pretty much all I use, although I have a mini-computer here running MX Linux which I like pretty well. I may break down and drop a Windows (7) partition on this one for some gaming, as well. Can't wait to get it!
Win7 is super nostalgic to me, I wish I could find an install disk for
it.
esc wrote to Gamgee <=-
It'll be running Slackware Linux, no doubt about that. It's pretty much all I use, although I have a mini-computer here running MX Linux which I like pretty well. I may break down and drop a Windows (7) partition on this one for some gaming, as well. Can't wait to get it!
Nice!
FYI System76 writes their own tools and drivers and things for
their OpenFirmware computers. I've had luck with Ubuntu, Pop_OS,
and Arch. I haven't tried Slackware but let me know if you need
any help with anything.
I used to run Slackware on one of the early Raspberri Pis and it worked fine.
Slackware has an ARM port still going so it should be doable:
If your new server has hardware virtulation support, then one option could be to pass the hd controller (ie: a LSI sata/sas card) through to a VM running either trunas or nas4free... Then make a ZFS raid mirror from the drives...
It will give you more controll than a dedicate nas box ever will.
\/orlon
aka
Stephen
Win7 is super nostalgic to me, I wish I could find an install disk
for it.
Just google "windows 7 archive.org" and your prayers will be answered :P
Just google "windows 7 archive.org" and your prayers will be answered
Does it come with keys?
Does it come with keys?
[...]If your new server has hardware virtulation support, then one option
Yes.. it has Virtualization support. It is a dell PowerEdge T630.
a mix.. Run VMs on the SSDs and use HDDs for mass storage. Hopefully in
a couple of weeks i will start moving things to it. :) I hear TrueNAS is
a great OS to run.
Does it come with keys?
You can get by quite satisfactorily without keys for Win7...
nag you, but didn't know that about Windows 7. But hasn't Windows had product activation since Windows XP? I thought if you didn't have a serial
nag you, but didn't know that about Windows 7. But hasn't Windows had
product activation since Windows XP? I thought if you didn't have a
serial
I thought it was from Win95.
VT-x is the actual hardware virtualisation assistance - absolute
necessary, whereas VT-d allows you direct passthrough of devices,
such as PCI devices, not essential in PC environments but nice to have
when running server (vSphere server where you need RAID cards
passed through directly to the guest etc.).
\/orlonVorlon,
aka
Stephen
Rocking FSXnet with an Amiga 4000 and Zeus BBS.
I know for Windows 8.1-11, there are certain features disabled and it will nag you, but didn't know that about Windows 7. But hasn't Windows had
also plan on setting up a few more Linux servers for testing. I like to crash and burn on new things before i set them up on VM's that i care
about because they often have things i care about on them. :) Right now
i am trying to determine if my Server 2019 Datacenter license is able to
be upgraded to Server 2022 for free. I have heard mixed things. Most
likely i will just upgrade and see how it turns out. I am also not sure
if the upgrade will benefit me at all. :)
I hear you... I've attempted to update a Debian 11 system to 12 three times now and something always borks the install or fails outright... And yes I'm not workin on the production VM, but one of it's restored backups.
It should be able to be upgraded.. One thing that's annoying is MS hase made it more win10/11 in look.... %-/
In the past I've blown away the current install, and done a new fresh one...
\/orlon
aka
Stephen
Vorlon wrote to DaveW <=-
VT-x is the actual hardware virtualisation assistance - absolute necessary, whereas VT-d allows you direct passthrough of devices,
such as PCI devices, not essential in PC environments but nice to have when running server (vSphere server where you need RAID cards
passed through directly to the guest etc.).
I cant count the times i borked some server setup that i was learning.
So i just install onto a test VM and once it is working and i can
replicate it properly, I do it on a production server. My terms are
funny because productions is just some tools i use. It is mostly just a home lab. :)
It should be able to be upgraded.. One thing that's annoying is MS have
made it more win10/11 in look.... %-/
Not sure what i did wrong but i setup a VM of Server 2022 and tried to
use the license and it didnt work. That is weird because my reading says
cheap on Amazon and Ebay. Right now i have dual 2650s. I am still kind
of undecided on whether i want to use Proxmox as my main OS or Server
2019 Datacenter. What are your thoughts??
VT-x is the actual hardware virtualisation assistance - absolute
necessary, whereas VT-d allows you direct passthrough of devices, such
as PCI devices, not essential in PC environments but nice to have when
running server (vSphere server where you need RAID cards passed
through directly to the guest etc.).
Good to know - I was never sure about the difference.
I'd go with Proxmox. Unless you know a heap of powershell, then you want to learn more linux, so go proxmox.Vorlon,
\/orlon
aka
Stephen
NUC?
Yup, my main server is a NUC. I run ESXi on it - which gives me a web console to it, and makes it easier to run VMs. Proxmox would probably do the job as well, but I've never used it.
My NUC runs about 6 or so machines, but I have many others defined on there that I've started to try something out...
I'd go with Proxmox. Unless you know a heap of powershell, then you want
to learn more linux, so go proxmox.
i am far from an expert with PowerShell. When i got my MCSE years
ago, it was before Powershell.. I can get by a little bit if needed. I think i am going with Proxmox as soon as I get some storage to put this
to use. :)
You will be able to get your head around proxmox.. Your curently doing things with your limited system now, so it's just easy to transfer... Going with a ms based product means learning from scratch.
You will be able to get your head around proxmox.. Your curently doing
things with your limited system now, so it's just easy to transfer...
Going with a ms based product means learning from scratch.
I am getting familiar with Proxmox. I recently upgraded my current Proxmox Server to version 8.
I would like to become more familiar with Proxmox from the terminal though. Right now i am doing almost everything D> from the GUI. I guess it is finally a first where i can say that I am
more comfortable with the Linux solution rather than the Windows
solution.
Yeah, upgrading Proxmox is one of the most easy/stable upgrade process's I've seen.Vorlon,
As it's based on Debian, most things that relate to Debian apply. There are things that need doing in the shell, that the GUI can't do. A lot of them are backend related items.
Yeah, upgrading Proxmox is one of the most easy/stable upgrade process'sYes.. it went very smooth. I was very nervous though because I
I've seen.
never did this and was afraid of breaking everything!!!! Luckily it went very smooth. I know I had to setup some update library for those who do
not have a subscription. Overall it was a smooth upgrade.
The other thing i would love to learn is some javascript code that
will work with my SynchroNet BBS. I would love to write a few small
things. Just to know that i was able to do it. :)
That's just a matter of a apt line... I chnage that right after installing, as I'm not using the "enterprise/subscription" system either.Vorlon,
Re: Re: Intel NUCs[...]
By: Vorlon to DaveW on Mon Sep 18 2023 10:27 am
That's just a matter of a apt line... I chnage that right after
installing,
as I'm not using the "enterprise/subscription" system either.
Everything is a learning process. I recently got my Dell PowerEdge
My day job also gets in the way of my hobby.. I guess the only difference between my job and my hobby is that my hobby allows me to
work on the computers that are mine. lol
To often day job get's in the way! #-0; But part of my day job is also playing around and tinkering with systems.... Ie: Lately has been testing upgrade process from one software version to the next... At the OS level.Hello,
Then there is also tinkering with new options idea's in AmiDeb my Amiga emulation system. ( https://amiga.vk3heg.net )
At home, right now i have been going insane over getting
SynchroNet working with AmigaNet. I have been going insane because it
isn't working and i am not getting any errors.. UGH!!! lol The things i enjoy make me insane sometimes!!! hahahahaha
You Amiganet messages did escape from your system, and there was even a few replys to them... I would have responded myself, but got beeten to the punch line.
You should just be able to mirror the fsx/fido settings, but use amiga net address... They are alfter all using the same technology.
[...]You should just be able to mirror the fsx/fido settings, but use amiga
net address... They are alfter all using the same technology.
I finally got it working. I was using FSXNet and TQWNet as a
groups when i needed to use the internal code. On the other networks I setup, these Items were the same.
Like my earlier message, it is the fun in figuring these things out.
:)
That's the fun thing about this technology! It might be dated, but there are still things to work out. Once you get things going, it's then just a matter of keeping things in order and small tweeks to the system.
\/orlonHello,
aka
Stephen
That's the fun thing about this technology! It might be dated, but there
are still things to work out. Once you get things going, it's then just a
matter of keeping things in order and small tweeks to the system.
Hello,
Whether it is new tech or old tech, figuring things out and
learning is always fun!!!
If you break it, you get all the bits that fell on the floor and then it's your problem.... %-;hahahahaha!! I will just vacuum them up!!!! :)
\/orlon
aka
Stephen
| Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
|---|---|
| Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
| Users: | 104 |
| Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
| Uptime: | 08:52:30 |
| Calls: | 7,071 |
| Calls today: | 13 |
| Files: | 8,560 |
| D/L today: |
395 files (386M bytes) |
| Messages: | 373,590 |
| Posted today: | 2 |