I am getting messages through the .qwk network. To receive the files, I need to also get a node/net number?
I am getting messages through the .qwk network. To receive the files, I need to also get a node/net number?
I am getting messages through the .qwk network. To receive the files, I need to also get a node/net number?
My hunch is that the answer to that question is yes as a standard HUB normally tosses files to a node number and the TIC that ships with a
file contains the usual FTN addressing schema used by nodes 21:x/xxx
Al wrote to Grease <=-
I am getting messages through the .qwk network. To receive the files, I need to also get a node/net number?
I don't think so. BP can just put files in your QWKNODE.out directory
and you will get them in your QWKNODE.in directory then you can put
them where you want them to go.
BP may give you a point address just to send you tic's along with these files. That would be an easy way (not really) for him to get those
files to you. You may be able to use tickit to move those files into
your filebase. You'd need to move those file into your inbound for
tickit to do what it does. If you don't want the tic's you could just delete them.
It would take a bit of experimentation but you could use this method to get the files hatched on the FTN side of fsxNet (or any files, I
suppose) to your QWK node.
Avon wrote to Grease <=-
Dan - what are your thoughts? I'm not across how you have Synchronet
set up but recall reading a thread between you and Al about this
subject recently.
I don't think so. BP can just put files in your QWKNODE.out directory
and you will get them in your QWKNODE.in directory then you can put
them where you want them to go.
This may be the way to go. I can then just move them into the correct directories.
Al wrote to Grease <=-
Yep, it's not hard to do.
/sbbs/data/qnet/QWKID.out (case is important on linux). I suspect BP
would use something like /sbbs/data/qnet/DARKMAT.out and you may find those files in /sbbs/data/qnet/FSXNET.in or something along those
lines.
Looks good. I went searching for darkmatt.out or in, and didn't find anything. I did find some vertrauen.xxxx.bad in ../data though.
Whereever it shows up, I'm sure I can find it. Thanks for your help.
I am getting messages through the .qwk network. To receive the files, need to also get a node/net number?
My hunch is that the answer to that question is yes as a standard HUB normally tosses files to a node number and the TIC that ships with a
file contains the usual FTN addressing schema used by nodes 21:x/xxx
Dan - what are your thoughts? I'm not across how you have Synchronet set up but recall reading a thread between you and Al about this subject recently.
I don't think so. BP can just put files in your QWKNODE.out directory and you will get them in your QWKNODE.in directory then you can put them where you want them to go.
This may be the way to go. I can then just move them into the correct directories.
I don't want to put someone out. I'm just getting into .tic files now.
I wouldn't mind experimenting. I just don't want to cause a stir.
Obtaining a node address would be the easiest way. I was going to spend
I don't want to put someone out. I'm just getting into .tic files now
It's not a problem. Now I'm curious how we can get this working for you.
I wouldn't mind experimenting. I just don't want to cause a stir.
I'm also in favor of experimenting. Let's see what we can get set up.
That way if anyone want to send netmail to those systems it would route through.
DM has built a good way to do this and other BBSs that support QWK
could do this too, if they wanted to.
DM has built a good way to do this and other BBSs that support QWK
could do this too, if they wanted to.
DM is the abbreviation for what?
On 11-01-19 21:44, Al wrote to Avon <=-
That way if anyone want to send netmail to those systems it would route through.
Synchronet does have netmail between nodes but it is an extention, I believe. I'm not certain it extends to OLRs, but SBBS qwk links can
read and send netmail between them.
They are not FTN in any way though, so they are separate from FTN and don't need or use any kind of FTN setup.
I'm not sure I am using the correct term there, netmail. They might be better called email. It's all between the linked QWK nodes. They can
send directly to a node or route to a node if there is no direct link.
I'm not sure but I don't think there is a way to bridge the gap between QWK and FTN as far as these netmail or emails go.
You can address a netmail to user@BBSID from an offline reader. It's quite a useful extension.
What SBBS's QWK support doesn't do though is TIC style file echos.
On 11-02-19 04:33, Al wrote to Vk3jed <=-
You can address a netmail to user@BBSID from an offline reader. It's quite a useful extension.
Good to know. I rarely use offline anymore so wasn't sure about that.
What SBBS's QWK support doesn't do though is TIC style file echos.
I think it can be done but files need to be moved to the inbound so
it's not as simple as FTN. It's possible that tickit could support
tic's from QWK nodes I think but haven't really delved into it. Maybe
if this test works out some feedback to the SBBS developers re: "ways
to make it easier" could be done.
Have to flesh out the details.
DM has built a good way to do this and other BBSs that support QWK
could do this too, if they wanted to.
DM is the abbreviation for what?
Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
---|---|
Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
Users: | 91 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 18:25:48 |
Calls: | 5,074 |
Calls today: | 6 |
Files: | 8,491 |
Messages: | 352,939 |
Posted today: | 1 |