• Receive files

    From Grease@21:4/10 to All on Thu Oct 31 13:24:24 2019
    I am getting messages through the .qwk network. To receive the files, I need to
    also get a node/net number?

    Grease
    darkmatt.synchro.net

    ---
    ■ Synchronet ■ Dark Matter BBS * darkmatt.synchro.net * FSXNet * Howdy from Texas!
    * Origin: fsxNet FTN<>QWK Gateway (21:4/10)
  • From Avon@21:1/101 to Grease on Fri Nov 1 12:35:20 2019
    On 31 Oct 2019 at 01:24p, Grease pondered and said...

    I am getting messages through the .qwk network. To receive the files, I need to also get a node/net number?

    My hunch is that the answer to that question is yes as a standard HUB normally tosses files to a node number and the TIC that ships with a file contains
    the usual FTN addressing schema used by nodes 21:x/xxx

    Dan - what are your thoughts? I'm not across how you have Synchronet set up
    but recall reading a thread between you and Al about this subject recently.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 2019/03/03 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (21:1/101)
  • From Al@21:4/106 to Grease on Thu Oct 31 17:24:14 2019
    I am getting messages through the .qwk network. To receive the files, I need to also get a node/net number?

    I don't think so. BP can just put files in your QWKNODE.out directory and
    you will get them in your QWKNODE.in directory then you can put them
    where you want them to go.

    BP may give you a point address just to send you tic's along with these
    files. That would be an easy way (not really) for him to get those files
    to you. You may be able to use tickit to move those files into your
    filebase. You'd need to move those file into your inbound for tickit to
    do what it does. If you don't want the tic's you could just delete them.

    It would take a bit of experimentation but you could use this method to
    get the files hatched on the FTN side of fsxNet (or any files, I suppose)
    to your QWK node.

    Ttyl :-)
    Al

    --- MagickaBBS v0.13alpha (Linux/x86_64)
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (21:4/106)
  • From Al@21:4/106 to Avon on Thu Oct 31 17:32:28 2019
    I am getting messages through the .qwk network. To receive the files, I need to also get a node/net number?

    My hunch is that the answer to that question is yes as a standard HUB normally tosses files to a node number and the TIC that ships with a
    file contains the usual FTN addressing schema used by nodes 21:x/xxx

    To send files to a QWK node BP just needs to copy them to the QWK nodes QWKIN.out directory and they will arrive (after the QWKNODE polls) in
    that nodes QWKID.in directory. In that case they will stay there until
    they are moved away.

    It's an idea to assign a point address to QWK nodes (who want files) so
    when Mystic tosses inbound files it will send them also to the QWK node,
    as a point with tic files and set the filebox to the QWK nodes QWKID.out directory. Quite simple for the FTN hub, and I hope simple for the QWK
    node to move the files where they need to be.

    Ttyl :-)
    Al

    --- MagickaBBS v0.13alpha (Linux/x86_64)
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (21:4/106)
  • From Grease@21:4/10 to Al on Thu Oct 31 20:56:00 2019
    Al wrote to Grease <=-

    I am getting messages through the .qwk network. To receive the files, I need to also get a node/net number?

    I don't think so. BP can just put files in your QWKNODE.out directory
    and you will get them in your QWKNODE.in directory then you can put
    them where you want them to go.

    This may be the way to go. I can then just move them into the correct directories.


    BP may give you a point address just to send you tic's along with these files. That would be an easy way (not really) for him to get those
    files to you. You may be able to use tickit to move those files into
    your filebase. You'd need to move those file into your inbound for
    tickit to do what it does. If you don't want the tic's you could just delete them.

    I don't want to put someone out. I'm just getting into .tic files now.


    It would take a bit of experimentation but you could use this method to get the files hatched on the FTN side of fsxNet (or any files, I
    suppose) to your QWK node.

    I wouldn't mind experimenting. I just don't want to cause a stir.

    Grease
    darkmatt.synchro.net

    ... Computer Hacker wanted. Must have own axe.
    --- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
    ■ Synchronet ■ Dark Matter BBS * darkmatt.synchro.net * FSXNet * Howdy from Texas!
    * Origin: fsxNet FTN<>QWK Gateway (21:4/10)
  • From Grease@21:4/10 to Avon on Thu Oct 31 21:02:00 2019
    Avon wrote to Grease <=-

    Dan - what are your thoughts? I'm not across how you have Synchronet
    set up but recall reading a thread between you and Al about this
    subject recently.

    Al sent a message and discussed either put the files in the qwk.out box to
    me or set me up as a point. I don't want to put someone out of their way,
    I just would like to receive the files.

    I'm willing to try any means you guys come up with. I just don't have
    enough experience right now to come up with anything.

    Grease
    darkmatt.synchro.net

    ... Heisenberg may have slept here.
    --- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
    ■ Synchronet ■ Dark Matter BBS * darkmatt.synchro.net * FSXNet * Howdy from Texas!
    * Origin: fsxNet FTN<>QWK Gateway (21:4/10)
  • From Al@21:4/106 to Grease on Fri Nov 1 02:36:20 2019
    I don't think so. BP can just put files in your QWKNODE.out directory
    and you will get them in your QWKNODE.in directory then you can put
    them where you want them to go.

    This may be the way to go. I can then just move them into the correct directories.

    Yep, it's not hard to do.

    Thinking of all this I'm trying to remember the directory to use. I think it's..

    /sbbs/data/qnet/QWKID.out (case is important on linux). I suspect BP
    would use something like /sbbs/data/qnet/DARKMAT.out and you may find
    those files in /sbbs/data/qnet/FSXNET.in or something along those lines.

    Anyway, I'll leave you guys with that and if you have questions you know
    where to find me.. :)

    Ttyl :-)
    Al

    --- MagickaBBS v0.13alpha (Linux/x86_64)
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (21:4/106)
  • From Grease@21:4/10 to Al on Fri Nov 1 09:33:00 2019
    Al wrote to Grease <=-

    Yep, it's not hard to do.
    /sbbs/data/qnet/QWKID.out (case is important on linux). I suspect BP
    would use something like /sbbs/data/qnet/DARKMAT.out and you may find those files in /sbbs/data/qnet/FSXNET.in or something along those
    lines.

    Looks good. I went searching for darkmatt.out or in, and didn't find anything. I did find some vertrauen.xxxx.bad in ../data though. Whereever it shows up, I'm sure I can find it. Thanks for your help.

    Grease
    darkmatt.synchro.net
    ... "I think not," said Descartes; and promptly disappeared.
    --- MultiMail/Win v0.52
    ■ Synchronet ■ Dark Matter BBS * darkmatt.synchro.net * FSXNet * Howdy from Texas!
    * Origin: fsxNet FTN<>QWK Gateway (21:4/10)
  • From Al@21:4/106 to Grease on Fri Nov 1 18:57:34 2019
    Looks good. I went searching for darkmatt.out or in, and didn't find anything. I did find some vertrauen.xxxx.bad in ../data though.
    Whereever it shows up, I'm sure I can find it. Thanks for your help.

    Yep, those directories don't exist by default so they need to be created
    to do this.

    Ttyl :-)
    Al

    --- MagickaBBS v0.13alpha (Linux/x86_64)
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (21:4/106)
  • From Black Panther@21:1/186 to Avon on Fri Nov 1 21:51:20 2019
    On 01 Nov 2019, Avon said the following...

    I am getting messages through the .qwk network. To receive the files, need to also get a node/net number?

    My hunch is that the answer to that question is yes as a standard HUB normally tosses files to a node number and the TIC that ships with a
    file contains the usual FTN addressing schema used by nodes 21:x/xxx

    Dan - what are your thoughts? I'm not across how you have Synchronet set up but recall reading a thread between you and Al about this subject recently.

    Obtaining a node address would be the easiest way. I was going to spend some time this weekend to see if I could get Synchronet to toss the files into a filebox, and send them to the nodes. Each of the QWK nodes would have to have
    a tick processor set up, such as tickit, in order to process them on their
    end.

    I'll keep you posted. :)


    ---

    Black Panther(RCS)
    Castle Rock BBS

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 2019/03/02 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: Castle Rock BBS - bbs.castlerockbbs.com (21:1/186)
  • From Black Panther@21:1/186 to Grease on Fri Nov 1 21:55:00 2019
    On 31 Oct 2019, Grease said the following...

    I don't think so. BP can just put files in your QWKNODE.out directory and you will get them in your QWKNODE.in directory then you can put them where you want them to go.

    This may be the way to go. I can then just move them into the correct directories.

    This is what I'll work on this weekend. I'm really not feeling like trying to think too hard tonight. ;)

    I don't want to put someone out. I'm just getting into .tic files now.

    It's not a problem. Now I'm curious how we can get this working for you.

    I wouldn't mind experimenting. I just don't want to cause a stir.

    I'm also in favor of experimenting. Let's see what we can get set up.


    ---

    Black Panther(RCS)
    Castle Rock BBS

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 2019/03/02 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: Castle Rock BBS - bbs.castlerockbbs.com (21:1/186)
  • From Avon@21:1/101 to Black Panther on Sat Nov 2 17:15:26 2019
    On 01 Nov 2019 at 09:51p, Black Panther pondered and said...

    Obtaining a node address would be the easiest way. I was going to spend

    It sounded like a point address may be the way forward to assist this.
    I guess you could pick an address and then start to add QWK nodes as points
    off that and we list that in SYSTEMS.TXT alongside the QWK entry as well?

    That way if anyone want to send netmail to those systems it would route through.

    I confess as I type this I hadn't even thought about netmail for those
    systems and how it works.

    I really need to spend some time and play/setup some QWK stuff.

    Still looking for my time machine.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 2019/03/03 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (21:1/101)
  • From Avon@21:1/101 to Black Panther on Sat Nov 2 17:16:00 2019
    On 01 Nov 2019 at 09:55p, Black Panther pondered and said...

    I don't want to put someone out. I'm just getting into .tic files now

    It's not a problem. Now I'm curious how we can get this working for you.

    I wouldn't mind experimenting. I just don't want to cause a stir.

    I'm also in favor of experimenting. Let's see what we can get set up.

    Guys, this is fsxNet - go for it! :)

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 2019/03/03 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (21:1/101)
  • From Al@21:4/106 to Avon on Fri Nov 1 21:44:36 2019
    That way if anyone want to send netmail to those systems it would route through.

    Synchronet does have netmail between nodes but it is an extention, I
    believe. I'm not certain it extends to OLRs, but SBBS qwk links can read
    and send netmail between them.

    They are not FTN in any way though, so they are separate from FTN and
    don't need or use any kind of FTN setup.

    I'm not sure I am using the correct term there, netmail. They might be
    better called email. It's all between the linked QWK nodes. They can send directly to a node or route to a node if there is no direct link.

    I'm not sure but I don't think there is a way to bridge the gap between
    QWK and FTN as far as these netmail or emails go.

    DM has built a good way to do this and other BBSs that support QWK could
    do this too, if they wanted to.

    Ttyl :-)
    Al

    --- MagickaBBS v0.13alpha (Linux/x86_64)
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (21:4/106)
  • From Al@21:4/106 to Avon on Fri Nov 1 22:37:18 2019
    DM has built a good way to do this and other BBSs that support QWK
    could do this too, if they wanted to.

    One last detail.. :)

    Once a network admin has sent out an infopack with the details nodes need
    to setup, he/she is done.

    Nodes setup and connect when and if they want. They poll when they want
    and if they go away for any reason the system will delete their QWK
    account for inactivity and if they want back in they setup again.

    The network admin needs to keep his system up so others can access it but
    that is it. Sit back and enjoy the network.

    I'm a big fan of QWK.. :)

    Ttyl :-)
    Al

    --- MagickaBBS v0.13alpha (Linux/x86_64)
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (21:4/106)
  • From Oli@21:1/151 to Al on Sat Nov 2 08:02:48 2019
    DM has built a good way to do this and other BBSs that support QWK
    could do this too, if they wanted to.

    DM is the abbreviation for what?

    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20180707
    * Origin: 🌈 (21:1/151)
  • From Al@21:4/106 to Oli on Sat Nov 2 01:34:34 2019
    DM is the abbreviation for what?

    Rob Swindell Aka Digital Man, the author of Synchronet BBS.

    Ttyl :-)
    Al

    --- MagickaBBS v0.13alpha (Linux/x86_64)
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (21:4/106)
  • From Vk3jed@21:1/109 to Al on Sat Nov 2 22:14:00 2019
    On 11-01-19 21:44, Al wrote to Avon <=-

    That way if anyone want to send netmail to those systems it would route through.

    Synchronet does have netmail between nodes but it is an extention, I believe. I'm not certain it extends to OLRs, but SBBS qwk links can
    read and send netmail between them.

    You can address a netmail to user@BBSID from an offline reader. It's quite a useful extension.

    They are not FTN in any way though, so they are separate from FTN and don't need or use any kind of FTN setup.

    I'm not sure I am using the correct term there, netmail. They might be better called email. It's all between the linked QWK nodes. They can
    send directly to a node or route to a node if there is no direct link.

    I'm not sure but I don't think there is a way to bridge the gap between QWK and FTN as far as these netmail or emails go.

    Not at this time, but technically, a gateway could be constructed. The key would be how to format addresses for gateway routing. probably something like user:destaddress@gateway, which would translate to user@destaddress after passing through the gateway. Hmm, maybe something for Digital Man to ponder. :) Whether destaddress and gateway contain a FTN or QWK address depends on which direction the netmail is travelling.

    What SBBS's QWK support doesn't do though is TIC style file echos.


    ... Optimist (adj) - One lacking sufficient experience.
    === MultiMail/Win v0.51
    --- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (21:1/109)
  • From Al@21:4/106 to Vk3jed on Sat Nov 2 04:33:12 2019
    You can address a netmail to user@BBSID from an offline reader. It's quite a useful extension.

    Good to know. I rarely use offline anymore so wasn't sure about that.

    What SBBS's QWK support doesn't do though is TIC style file echos.

    I think it can be done but files need to be moved to the inbound so it's
    not as simple as FTN. It's possible that tickit could support tic's from
    QWK nodes I think but haven't really delved into it. Maybe if this test
    works out some feedback to the SBBS developers re: "ways to make it
    easier" could be done.

    Have to flesh out the details.

    Ttyl :-)
    Al

    --- MagickaBBS v0.13alpha (Linux/x86_64)
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (21:4/106)
  • From Vk3jed@21:1/109 to Al on Sun Nov 3 12:28:00 2019
    On 11-02-19 04:33, Al wrote to Vk3jed <=-

    You can address a netmail to user@BBSID from an offline reader. It's quite a useful extension.

    Good to know. I rarely use offline anymore so wasn't sure about that.

    Yeah DM made sure user@address works for all netmail/email types - FTN, QWK and Internet.

    What SBBS's QWK support doesn't do though is TIC style file echos.

    I think it can be done but files need to be moved to the inbound so
    it's not as simple as FTN. It's possible that tickit could support
    tic's from QWK nodes I think but haven't really delved into it. Maybe
    if this test works out some feedback to the SBBS developers re: "ways
    to make it easier" could be done.

    I think it should be doable - the QWK addressing should allow for source, destionation and SEENBY fields in the QWK TIC (TWK? :) ) file. I for one would gladly carry file echos on QWK if there was a technical way to do it, and bonus points if file echos could also be gated between QWK and FTN, like message areas.

    Have to flesh out the details.

    Yep, out our heads together.


    ... I'm not nearly as think as you confused I am.
    === MultiMail/Win v0.51
    --- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (21:1/109)
  • From Joacim Melin@21:2/130 to Oli on Sun Nov 3 11:55:16 2019
    DM has built a good way to do this and other BBSs that support QWK
    could do this too, if they wanted to.

    DM is the abbreviation for what?

    Depeche Mode.
    Dungeon Master.
    Direct Message.

    Pick one. :D


    --- NiKom v2.5.0
    * Origin: Delta City (deltacity.se, Vallentuna, Sweden) (21:2/130.0)