Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
They don't even have hot girls anymore. It used to be at least
something to look at. I guess it's not politically correct for women to
be attractive.
It annoys me even more because this guy is a 1st term newbie who looks like he just finished high school, and all he can do is old tricks.
Don't they teach them anything new at Soros University?
Something very odd about their little protest yesterday is that it was
a tiny group of people (maybe 20 at the most) they all had signs, and
the media was there at just the right time to get a view of them to
show on TV. I'd like to find out who organizes these clearly planned protests so that I could shed some light on them.
They don't even have hot girls anymore. It used to be at least something to look at. I guess it's not politically correct for women be attractive.
I remember those days. But hot girls doing news is also a warning to
me. "What are they trying to distract me from?" Also, it's a sign that people aren't watching as much and they are trying to boose ratings.
It annoys me even more because this guy is a 1st term newbie who look like he just finished high school, and all he can do is old tricks. Don't they teach them anything new at Soros University?
They don't teach. They program.
They also don't have any self-awareness, so they can't see that what
they do isn't working.
protests so that I could shed some light on them.
Nothing about their protests are organic. They are all staged.
So in my little town a few days ago, there was a Trump protest. Of
course right outside the Woke library. It was appearant that none of these people were locals. We got close enough to read (and laugh at) their professionally printed signs and then walked away. But no real crowd - maybe a few people asking "what's going on?"
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
It's not just their looks though. These new people on the local news
just don't seem very professional anymore.
That sounds true, but their "success" depends on how stupid their constituents are (on the subject of freshman US Reps.)
These people had professional looking signs too. Can you imagine how stupid people look when they stand outside the welfare office with a
small protest group? Even if I was on their side of the issue, I'd be embarrassed to be on the news protesting -in front of the welfare
office- for "a threat against handouts."
If we go back 10 years, the people doing the news were also the people finding the news (usually with some help, but still...). Today the
people doing the news are just robots saying what their masters tell
them to say.
small protest group? Even if I was on their side of the issue, I'd be embarrassed to be on the news protesting -in front of the welfare office- for "a threat against handouts."
They still think they own the media and they are trying to create a Narrative of "big protest", but it's failing and they can't see it.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
People can now start saying "there's been more protests lately," but I just hope that whoever they say that to asks them "Do you know anyone
who protested though?"
People can now start saying "there's been more protests lately," but just hope that whoever they say that to asks them "Do you know anyone who protested though?"
It's getting harder. They just found that Osama was using USAID to launder money for funding "protests". So most of these protests are not locals, but rather people "bussed" in. And since the money is drying
up, there's not that many.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
My wife is an avid facebooker, and she's in the midst of an online argument with some guy from a labor union who is "leading" a protest against the perceived threat of the USPS being privatized.
and she asked the perfect question: "Do your members know that you're spending their union dues on a protest over something that didn't even happen yet?"
and she asked the perfect question: "Do your members know that you're spending
their union dues on a protest over something that didn't even happen yet?"
We're still waiting to see what he says about that. hehe
My wife is an avid facebooker, and she's in the midst of an online argument with some guy from a labor union who is "leading" a protest against the perceived threat of the USPS being privatized.
Ya, the postal workers don't like that idea. They might have to
actually put in a full day's work for once.
and she asked the perfect question: "Do your members know that you're spending
their union dues on a protest over something that didn't even happen yet
We're still waiting to see what he says about that. hehe
Protesting something after it happens is usually too late.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
It's annoying to hear people complain about losing their job when it's
a job that nobody needs them to do in the first place.
"I've been a bathroom attendant for USAID for 30 years! What am I gonna
do now!?"
It's annoying to hear people complain about losing their job when it' a job that nobody needs them to do in the first place.
But it's the old Union propaganda: You owned that job. It was YOURS. They took it away from you.
When, in reality, none of that was true.
and she asked the perfect question: "Do your members know that you're spending
their union dues on a protest over something that didn't even happen ye
We're still waiting to see what he says about that. hehe
Protesting something after it happens is usually too late.
Sometimes businesses have to close in order to do what's best for the owners o
the business, and that's exactly what might be happening in this case. And it'
happened to me twice.
Instead of protesting, they should communicate with their US reps about it. Because what can their protest actually do for them?
happened to me twice.
The difference being that the government is not a business. The post office was never meant to be a money making venture. Neither were the national parks but, guess what, in their case they actually do make
money. Yet DOGE decided to screw with them also.
Instead of protesting, they should communicate with their US reps about Because what can their protest actually do for them?
You don't think their reps will notice the protest?
The difference being that the government is not a business. The post office was never meant to be a money making venture. Neither were the national parks but, guess what, in their case they actually do make money. Yet DOGE decided to screw with them also.
Look at the debt, look at the waste, look at how bad politicians have turned our own money into weapons that hurt us. Time is limited. 4 years goes by fast
when you have a great president. We need to hurry it up and some mistakes will
surely be made along the way.
Instead of protesting, they should communicate with their US reps about
Because what can their protest actually do for them?
You don't think their reps will notice the protest?
I doubt it! When's the last time you've seen a US rep notice something? Or mor
importantly: When's the last time you've seen a US rep do anything that was worth the $250k paycheck that we give them year after year?
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
Right. If you don't like it, then call your union rep so that
he/she/they can take $1000 of your money and spend it on a protest ;)
Right. If you don't like it, then call your union rep so that
he/she/they can take $1000 of your money and spend it on a protest
;)
Yup. It's a big scam. Unions only protect bad workers. Good workers don't need Union "protection".
surely be made along the way.
They are making more mistakes than they are identifying actual waste. They had time to assemble a competent, experienced team before the inaguration, but instead went with Elon and his tech flunkies. They
have found a few things... things like centralizing IT purchases... that anyone could have found.
importantly: When's the last time you've seen a US rep do anything that worth the $250k paycheck that we give them year after year?
When was the last time you contacted, or attempted to contact, your rep and got ignored? You've complained about it at least once, if not
several times.
Nicholas Boel wrote to Dr. What <=-
While the pay may be the same for any journeyman of said trade, one
works and the other doesn't. Once the bad worker finally realizes that they don't work enough to make ends meet, they usually withdraw from
the union and go work somewhere else (oddly enough, usually non-union).
This is how it works in construction, anyways. YMMV.
They are making more mistakes than they are identifying actual waste. They had time to assemble a competent, experienced team before the inaguration, but instead went with Elon and his tech flunkies. They have found a few things... things like centralizing IT purchases... that anyone could have found.
I think I know what you mean. All the complaints about it are going to cost time and money. And yea, some stuff seems like it's being cancelled due to one-sidedness, but for now I'm enjoying it. I don't believe that they can cost
us more than they're saving, but we'll see.
importantly: When's the last time you've seen a US rep do anything that
worth the $250k paycheck that we give them year after year?
When was the last time you contacted, or attempted to contact, your rep and got ignored? You've complained about it at least once, if not several times.
Within the last 2 years I contacted (former) Rep Marcus Molinaro three times, and all 3 of the issues that I complained about still unresolved. I think DOGE
should start trimming the # of congressional districts ;) 2 Reps per state seems like it would be enough.
This is how it works in construction, anyways. YMMV.
Not in the unions I have dealt with (UAW and teachers)
Bad workers hang around, making work for others, and still get paid. I think that when a UAW worker is layed off they still get 80% of their
pay.
I have dealt with some good union workers, but they were very few and
far between. And really didn't need the union, but were required to be
in a union because they sold things to union shops.
If they had done their research, and terminated the low performing employees with cause, those employees would have at least been showing up to work in order to earn their pay until they got let go. This way, they did nothing during that time and now will be more difficult to get rid
of.
should start trimming the # of congressional districts ;) 2 Reps per sta seems like it would be enough.
That would also mean your state only gets 4 electoral votes. OTOH, if they are not going to be responsive to the people in their smaller districts, I don't understand why they cannot handle larger districts
just as "well."
Nicholas Boel wrote to Dr. What <=-
That's why the UAW is a small fraction of what it used to be. The
workers did it to themselves.
As for teacher unions, they don't seem to be in my area. Are they more inner city located?
As for teacher unions, they don't seem to be in my area. Are they
more inner city located?
The teacher's union is national. So you probably have it.
Participation depends on whether you are are a Right to Work state.
The parks employees might be a flop, but this is a big task and they're not finished yet. Some of this stuff can't go wrong, like the cutting of NSAID, Dept of Ed, and dead social security recipients. All things that should have been done decades ago.
That would also mean your state only gets 4 electoral votes. OTOH, if they are not going to be responsive to the people in their smaller districts, I don't understand why they cannot handle larger districts just as "well."
I guess it would make it easier for foreign billionaires to bribe the right people, but it would also simplify things, provide more clarity on how legislation and litigation is being handled, and it would get a lot of useless
people out of our way.
If things like NSAID and DofE are good cuts, they need to concentrate their efforts on them, but they are not really *trying* to save money. They have a list of things they just *don't like* and are trying to see how many of them they can get rid of without any legal or public
backlash.
Mike Powell wrote to AARON THOMAS <=-
They do when they cut something illegally and then have to put it back. For example, all of the parks employees they illegally terminated are
now back at work, with backpay for the period they were not working.
In other words, they got paid to not work.
If they had done their research, and terminated the low performing employees with cause, those employees would have at least been showing
up to work in order to earn their pay until they got let go. This way, they did nothing during that time and now will be more difficult to get rid of.
No savings there.
thatimportantly: When's the last time you've seen a US rep do anything
imes,worth the $250k paycheck that we give them year after year?
When was the last time you contacted, or attempted to contact, your rep and got ignored? You've complained about it at least once, if not several times.
Within the last 2 years I contacted (former) Rep Marcus Molinaro three
and all 3 of the issues that I complained about still unresolved. I thinkDOGE
should start trimming the # of congressional districts ;) 2 Reps per state seems like it would be enough.
That would also mean your state only gets 4 electoral votes. OTOH, if they are not going to be responsive to the people in their smaller districts, I don't understand why they cannot handle larger districts
just as "well."
* SLMR 2.1a * A distant ship, smoke on the horizon....
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
Nicholas Boel wrote to Dr. What <=-
I know it's national, and I believe we're still a right to work state.
I'm just saying I don't think the teachers at our local school district that my children go to are a part of a union.
We're about 30 miles from
the city, though. Far enough to still say the pledge every morning,
have shop classes in high school, and learn cursive. ;)
I see that too, based on the information that's been released about things tha
have been cut. Lots of liberal/leftie stuff. There's definitely a bit of revenge in the agenda, but I'm enjoying it.
The Biden admin did the same thing. They cancelled the Alaskan pipeline, they opened the border, they wasted tons of money that we still never saw the benefit from, and now it's time for some revenge of our own, whether it's smar
or not, it just feels good (to guys like me.)
"Move fast and break things" works when you're high on ketamine and
running a tech company, but not when you're entrusted with the
livelyhood of the American peoplem, their safety and well-being and the economy.
Or, does it work in the tech example? Musk just had to use the money he
was given for xAI for it to buy Twitter before they margin-called his Tesla stock because of the loss of value in both Tesla and X.
Mike Powell wrote to KURT WEISKE <=-
At all of the government, and private, sector jobs I have ever had, a contract employee acting in a similar manner would have long since been fired. I am surprised, but also not surprised, that Trump has let Musk hang on this long. 2016 Trump would have fired him by now.
At all of the government, and private, sector jobs I have ever had, a contract employee acting in a similar manner would have long since been fired. I am surprised, but also not surprised, that Trump has let Musk hang on this long. 2016 Trump would have fired him by now.
Musk claims he would be in jail if Trump lost. If that doesn't smack of
election tampering, I don't know what does. Imagine Musk throwing Trump
under the bus if fired?
Mike Powell wrote to KURT WEISKE <=-
I assumed he'd be in jail for some financial or other tomfoolery.
Election tampering is also possible.
Mike Powell wrote to KURT WEISKE <=-
I assumed he'd be in jail for some financial or other tomfoolery. Election tampering is also possible.
Musk is, among other things, an odd man. Why state that you'll be in
jail if Harris wins at a CAMPAIGN RALLY?
Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
---|---|
Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
Users: | 107 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 05:42:15 |
Calls: | 5,846 |
Calls today: | 5 |
Files: | 8,496 |
D/L today: |
363 files (296M bytes) |
Messages: | 343,096 |
Posted today: | 1 |