• IL Gun and Magazine Ban

    From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to All on Tue Dec 17 09:17:00 2024
    Per the January 2025 edition of American Rifleman, the US District Court
    for the Southern District of Illinois struck down parts of the Protect
    Illinois Communities Act (PICA) that restricted "assault weapons" and "large-capcacity magazines" in the case of Barnett v. Raoul.

    Using the SCOTUS text-and-history test, the court found that these weapons
    and accessories are "common arms," but not "dangerous and unusual," which
    means that they are protected by the US Constitution's 2nd Amendment.

    This happened on November 8 of this year.

    I tried to find a link online to this info but was not successful.



    --- MultiMail/DOS v0.52
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Andrew Leary@1:320/219 to Mike Powell on Wed Dec 18 23:56:35 2024
    Hello Mike!

    17 Dec 24 09:17, you wrote to all:

    Per the January 2025 edition of American Rifleman, the US District
    Court for the Southern District of Illinois struck down parts of the Protect Illinois Communities Act (PICA) that restricted "assault
    weapons" and "large-capcacity magazines" in the case of Barnett v.
    Raoul.

    Using the SCOTUS text-and-history test, the court found that these
    weapons and accessories are "common arms," but not "dangerous and unusual," which means that they are protected by the US Constitution's
    2nd Amendment.

    This happened on November 8 of this year.

    Good! Hopefully this will end up as a basis for challenging Connecticut's unconstitutional "assault weapon" and "large-capacity magazine" bans.

    Andrew

    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20240209
    * Origin: Phoenix BBS * phoenix.bnbbbs.net (1:320/219)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to ANDREW LEARY on Thu Dec 19 09:10:00 2024
    Per the January 2025 edition of American Rifleman, the US District
    Court for the Southern District of Illinois struck down parts of the Protect Illinois Communities Act (PICA) that restricted "assault weapons" and "large-capcacity magazines" in the case of Barnett v. Raoul.

    Using the SCOTUS text-and-history test, the court found that these weapons and accessories are "common arms," but not "dangerous and unusual," which means that they are protected by the US Constitution's 2nd Amendment.

    This happened on November 8 of this year.

    Good! Hopefully this will end up as a basis for challenging Connecticut's unconstitutional "assault weapon" and "large-capacity magazine" bans.

    Yes, we can sure hope so!

    Mike


    * SLMR 2.1a * Sir! Romulan Warbird decloaking off th #%NO CARRIER
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)