Russia? It was our project, we've sent military aid and people
there. DNR/LNR were puppet states.
Ukraine authority has told many times that the autonomy of Donbass and
amnesty for rebels will never be despite these things are in the
Minsk agreements. That's why the conflict has lasted so long.
So Russian cities should be bombed because our participation in
war in Syria? Ukraine had military conflict with Russia as one
of the players on it's territory.
You should understand a simple thing, that there are countries which
can be bombed -- like Iraq, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan etc, but there are
countries which cannot be bombed because of their nuclear umbrella.
And in making your offensive policy you need be cautious in relations
with the later. It is natural as human relations. If you see a strong
man you will be polite with him. Correct? ;)
Without Russian's military help the whole DNR/LNR project was
nothing.
Ukraine is doomed as a whole country if Ukrainan nationalists continue
their aggressive ukrainization.
We had military conflicts between India and Pakistan, they both
had nuclear weapons.
Happily there was a draw then. There were not reasons to use it.
We had military conflicts between India and Pakistan,
they both had nuclear weapons.
Happily there was a draw then. There were not reasons to
use it.
So you are agree that you were not right? :)
Russia has no reason to use nukes unless struck heavily. The same was
You mean - Putin? Because Russia is not Putin. And he is crazy
enough.
Yes, Putin.
| Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
|---|---|
| Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
| Users: | 112 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 03:03:37 |
| Calls: | 8,585 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 9,510 |
| D/L today: |
224 files (65,482K bytes) |
| Messages: | 414,117 |