Let me remember that during WWII Sweden allowed Nazis to transfer troops across its territory to fight in Russia. No one elected anyone to stop them.
NATO will not fight a war for Ukraine.
Let me remember that during WWII Sweden allowed Nazis to transfer
troops across its territory to fight in Russia. No one elected
anyone to stop them.
Why would anyone stop them? Sweden was expected to be neutral.
Let me remember that during WWII Sweden allowed Nazis to transfer
troops across its territory to fight in Russia. No one elected anyone BF>DP> to stop them.
Why would anyone stop them? Sweden was expected to be neutral.
"It's like: I am ready to give ride to a maniac who is going to kill and rape my neighbor. I am so proud of me."
Sounds very neutral?
Why would anyone stop them? Sweden was expected to be neutral.
Neutrality, in my book, is explained different.
Why would anyone stop them? Sweden was expected to be neutral.
Neutrality, in my book, is explained different.
So, in your book, how should a neutral country act in that infamous situation? Wouldn't not allowing the transport be an obvious way to demonstrate siding with the Allies against the Axis?
a situation which it tries itself to talk out of ever since.
Wouldn't not allowing the transport be an obvious way to
demonstrate siding with the Allies against the Axis?
A double negative ... oh dear ... ;-)
a situation which it tries itself to talk out of ever since.
Well, we posed no restrictions on who could use our public
transportations. How does that differ from e.g. allowing black people
from using white peoples transportation?
Maybe you don't know that Sweden also allowed US bombers to not only
pass Swedish airspace, but even were taken care of when they (more than
160 of them) were forced to make an emergency landing here after they'd been crippled by German air defence, and some 1400 US airmen were taken care of.
By the rules of Sweden's neutrality, the planes and their crews were interned. Early in the war this was not a problem as Allied and German personnel were generally returned on a one-for-one basis. But as the war progressed, a far greater number of Allied planes and crews ended up in Sweden, and they were forced to remain there.
Sweden also provided the cargo ships which transported Swedish ore for
the German ball-bearing factories
Putin can get everything he wants, without ever firing a shot, orUkraine plans to take back Donbass in january with this president.
having new sanctions placed on Russia. So why go to war when you
don't have to?
There are 150.000 troops at the border with the unrecognised
republics. They will try to reestablish the territorial integrity.
It's their right. Do you think Putin will just watch this?
"It's like: I am ready to give ride to a maniac who is going to
kill and rape my neighbor. I am so proud of me."
Sounds very neutral?
What two opposing sides would that be neutral to?
40% of the Swedish ore went to Germany, 60% went to England. Yes, not exactly neutral, but very close.
How much of the Belgian ore went to England?
And, speaking of neutrality, Switzerland also claimed to be neutral,...
look what happened to all the Nazi "spoils of war" that still is unaccounted for in Swiss banks. How does that compare to the Swedish transit allowance?
And no, I don't think that allowing the Germans to send soldiers
through Sweden to Russia prolonged the war. On the contrary, haven't we
all agreed that the eastern front was what eventually caused the war to end? If all those German soldiers hadn't been sent to Russia, they may
have been left on the western front...
Forget it Bjorn, Sweden is already 76 years trying to talk itself out of this...
SO? Most of the people in southern Texas speak Spanish as their native language, and are aligned with Hispanic culture. Does that imply that Mexico should have the right to annex southern Texas??
Björn to you, please.
But yes, lets forget it. It all happened long before I was even a
horny glimpse in my fathers eye, and I sincerely believe in
non-patriotism (after religion the second major reason for wars).
All I can say is that I applaud every possible way to stay out of the conflicts that kings and presidents have between them, convincing
gullible citizens to go out and fight it out for them.
SO? Most of the people in southern Texas speak Spanish as their native language, and are aligned with Hispanic culture. Does that imply that Mexico should have the right to annex southern Texas??
Crimea seceded from Ukraine in full compliance with Ukrainian and international law.
From the perspective of international law Crimea still belongs to
Ukraine.
And Russia used military force to take control of the peninsula and to force Ukrainian troops not to intervene in the process of secession.
And Russia used military force to take control of the peninsula and to force Ukrainian troops not to intervene in the process of secession.
From the perspective of international law Crimea still belongs to
Ukraine.
Crimea was an autonomous republic with a corresponding right of self-determination, and it used one. What's wrong? Tell me what
specific law has been broken?
And yes, Putin admited he sent troops to Crimea.
Crimea was an autonomous republic with a corresponding right of
self-determination, and it used one. What's wrong? Tell me what
specific law has been broken?
The UN Charter, all bilateral international treaties concluded between Russia and Ukraine were violated.
And yes, Putin admited he sent troops to Crimea.
And the peoples of Crimea chose to rescind that and return to Russian administration.
Hi, David!
17 дек 21 06:10, David Drummond -> Lee Lofaso:
And I, as a native of Crimea, can confirm with full responsibility that everyone who could come - really voted and even those who found it difficult to walk - came and voted to secede from Ukraine.
In Australia it is compulsory to vote. Failure without a good
explanation attracts a fine.
In the over 40 years I have lived here I have never voted - but then, I
am not a citizen and have no voting rights.
However, at least in Australia, it matters not which way one votes, the country still gets the same shitty politicians.
You have the right not to love Putin and the whole of Russia, but do
not talk nonsense about the withdrawal of Crimea from Ukraine. Not any
of "Putin's soldiers" were not at the referendum. Police and civilian volunteers guarded the order.
If you spend 2 minutes to listen to what Putin said:
Better is the Belgian system where you will die from boredom watching parliament in action ...
Russia needs a decent, unmanipulated election where opposition is not thrown into jail from the moment they hit the streets. Besides, I
think types of government where so much power is in the hand of a
single person is wrong ... Better is the Belgian system where you will
die from boredom watching parliament in action ...
Just out of curiosity: is there any chance that Belgium could be partitioned and Flanders could join the Netherlands and Wallonia could join France (because of the linguistic division)?
Better is the Belgian system where you will die from boredom
watching parliament in action ...
I also think that Belgium still holds the world record for time
without a government, almost two years, right?
The main advantage without a government for a couple of years is that
we don't get all the new laws, one more stupid than the other, all
because lawmakers want to make a statement...
Just out of curiosity: is there any chance that Belgium could be partitioned and Flanders could join the Netherlands and Wallonia could
join France (because of the linguistic division)?
I say this is unlikely to happen. Belgium secceeded from The Netherlands
in 1830. I doubt there is a majority in either The Netherlands or
Flanders that wants to undo that secession.
An exepriment on a much smaller scale, merging Fidonet R28 en R29 failed.
BTW, try googling " sjoemelpoedel " ...
BTW, try googling " sjoemelpoedel " ...
I tried, but only ended up at sites full of ads, chatter and nothing
much info. Was it some kind of kind of charity scandal?
It's life -- old people think slower and became absent-minded. And, besides, wisdom came, which tells that chess now is foolish way of time spending. ;-)
But politicians are old people as a rule. Young politicians act too radically. It is bad.
There are no such thing as facts - only opinions.
At least that's what I think.
Actually, their actions will be either positive for people or negative. People in democratic countries must decide it themselves.
Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
---|---|
Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
Users: | 106 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 09:05:38 |
Calls: | 5,898 |
Calls today: | 14 |
Files: | 8,497 |
D/L today: |
89 files (19,133K bytes) |
Messages: | 345,112 |
Posted today: | 3 |