• How to add an additional

    From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to JAS on Wed Sep 17 09:36:27 2025
    16 Sep 14:35:24 [45224] created /var/spool/ftn/outb.015/000300z4.csy
    16 Sep 14:35:24 [45224] call to 21:x/y00@fidonet
    16 Sep 14:35:24 [45223] 21:x/y00@fsxnet busy, skipping
    16 Sep 14:35:24 [45224] getaddrinfo failed: Name does not resolve (8)

    Is there a reason you are obscuring the net/node number, or is it really showing up in the logs as 21:x/y00@fsxnet?

    If it is really showing up with the x and the y in it, then I am pretty
    sure that is your issue. Those should be numbers.

    If you are obscuring them, I would suggest that maybe you use the node's
    actual address instead of relying on the zone lookup. It could be down or
    not otherwise functioning properly. There is also something
    odd going on there with the second line showing '@fidonet' while the third correctly says '@fsxnet' but I am not sure what might be causing that.


    * SLMR 2.1a * Do ministers do more than lay people?
    --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From JAS@4:900/733 to Mike Powell on Wed Sep 17 14:46:04 2025

    Hello Mike!

    17 Sep 25 09:36, you wrote to me:

    At first I was changin those numbers for privacy. I finally solved the issue by commenting out the last line I had in binkf.conf that allowed to connect to unlisted destinations.

    # Default node flags. Binkd will call an unlisted node if "defnode" is defined. #
    #defnode -nd *

    16 Sep 14:35:24 [45224] created /var/spool/ftn/outb.015/000300z4.csy
    16 Sep 14:35:24 [45224] call to 21:x/y00@fidonet
    16 Sep 14:35:24 [45223] 21:x/y00@fsxnet busy, skipping
    16 Sep 14:35:24 [45224] getaddrinfo failed: Name does not resolve
    (8)

    Is there a reason you are obscuring the net/node number, or is it
    really showing up in the logs as 21:x/y00@fsxnet?

    If it is really showing up with the x and the y in it, then I am
    pretty sure that is your issue. Those should be numbers.

    If you are obscuring them, I would suggest that maybe you use the
    node's actual address instead of relying on the zone lookup. It could
    be down or not otherwise functioning properly. There is also
    something odd going on there with the second line showing '@fidonet'
    while the third correctly says '@fsxnet' but I am not sure what might
    be causing that.


    * SLMR 2.1a * Do ministers do more than lay people?
    --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

    JAS


    --- GoldED+/BSD 1.1.5-b20170303-b20170303 + HPT 1.9.0 + Binkd 1.1a-115
    * Origin: FIDONODO DE JAS | ¯\_(O,O)_/¯ (4:900/733)
  • From JAS@4:900/733 to Wilfred van Velzen on Thu Sep 18 15:48:08 2025

    Hello Wilfred and JM!

    18 Sep 25 18:31, you wrote to Joacim Melin:

    LOL you are right, its something I just got used to do.

    Hi Joacim,

    On 2025-09-18 17:01:32, you wrote to JAS:

    At first I was changin those numbers for privacy. I finally
    solved the issue by commenting out the last line I had in
    binkf.conf that allowed to connect to unlisted destinations.

    16 Sep 14:35:24 [45224] call to 21:x/y00@fidonet

    If you are obscuring them, I would suggest that maybe you use
    the node's actual address instead of relying on the zone
    lookup. It could be down or not otherwise functioning
    properly. There is also something odd going on there with the
    second line showing '@fidonet' while the third correctly says
    '@fsxnet' but I am not sure what might be causing that.

    You realize there is a nodelist and you will be in it? :)

    He's obscuring who he is linking to in fsx net. I can't imagine that
    is sensitive information, but it's up to him (and his link) to decide about that... ;-)


    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.4-B20240523
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)

    JAS


    --- GoldED+/BSD 1.1.5-b20170303-b20170303 + HPT 1.9.0 + Binkd 1.1a-115
    * Origin: FIDONODO DE JAS | ¯\_(O,O)_/¯ (4:900/733)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to Joacim Melin on Thu Sep 18 18:31:18 2025
    Hi Joacim,

    On 2025-09-18 17:01:32, you wrote to JAS:

    At first I was changin those numbers for privacy. I finally solved the
    issue by commenting out the last line I had in binkf.conf that allowed
    to connect to unlisted destinations.

    16 Sep 14:35:24 [45224] call to 21:x/y00@fidonet

    If you are obscuring them, I would suggest that maybe you use the
    node's actual address instead of relying on the zone lookup. It
    could be down or not otherwise functioning properly. There is also
    something odd going on there with the second line showing '@fidonet'
    while the third correctly says '@fsxnet' but I am not sure what
    might be causing that.

    You realize there is a nodelist and you will be in it? :)

    He's obscuring who he is linking to in fsx net. I can't imagine that is sensitive information, but it's up to him (and his link) to decide about that... ;-)


    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.4-B20240523
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to JAS on Thu Sep 18 09:45:57 2025
    At first I was changin those numbers for privacy. I finally solved the issue b
    commenting out the last line I had in binkf.conf that allowed to connect to unlisted destinations.

    # Default node flags. Binkd will call an unlisted node if "defnode" is defined
    #
    #defnode -nd *

    Good catch! Glad you fixed it.

    Mike


    * SLMR 2.1a * You are now entering a School Free Drug Zone.
    --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Joacim Melin@2:221/242 to JAS on Thu Sep 18 17:01:32 2025

    Hello Mike!

    17 Sep 25 09:36, you wrote to me:

    At first I was changin those numbers for privacy. I finally solved the issue by commenting out the last line I had in binkf.conf that allowed
    to connect to unlisted destinations.

    # Default node flags. Binkd will call an unlisted node if "defnode" is defined.
    #
    #defnode -nd *

    16 Sep 14:35:24 [45224] created /var/spool/ftn/outb.015/000300z4.csy
    16 Sep 14:35:24 [45224] call to 21:x/y00@fidonet
    16 Sep 14:35:24 [45223] 21:x/y00@fsxnet busy, skipping
    16 Sep 14:35:24 [45224] getaddrinfo failed: Name does not resolve
    (8)

    Is there a reason you are obscuring the net/node number, or is it
    really showing up in the logs as 21:x/y00@fsxnet?

    If it is really showing up with the x and the y in it, then I am
    pretty sure that is your issue. Those should be numbers.

    If you are obscuring them, I would suggest that maybe you use the
    node's actual address instead of relying on the zone lookup. It could
    be down or not otherwise functioning properly. There is also
    something odd going on there with the second line showing '@fidonet'
    while the third correctly says '@fsxnet' but I am not sure what might
    be causing that.

    You realize there is a nodelist and you will be in it? :)


    --- NiKom v2.6.0
    * Origin: Delta City (deltacity.se, Vallentuna, Sweden) (2:221/242.0)