How about moving ECHOCFG to SCFG? That way all configs are in one place instead of having them separate.

$ The Millionaire $

---
￭ Synchronet ￭ Vertrauen ￭ Home of Synchronet ￭ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Digital Man on Wed May 11 2022 02:06 pm

How about moving ECHOCFG to SCFG? That way all configs are in one place instead of having them separate.

Perhaps. I don't see that as a major improvement or need, but I understand why it could be considered "better" by some people.
--
digital man (rob)

Synchronet "Real Fact" #49:
Synchronet program was named 'sbbs' instead of 'sync' to avoid conflict w/Unix Norco, CA WX: 66.1°F, 33.0% humidity, 11 mph ESE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs ---
■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Digital Man to The Millionaire on Wed May 11 2022 04:40 pm

How about moving ECHOCFG to SCFG? That way all configs are in one
place instead of having them separate.

Perhaps. I don't see that as a major improvement or need, but I understand why it could be considered "better" by some people.

I might be remembering wrong, but I think this question had come up before. I thought the reason for having them separate was that some sysops might choose not to add any FTN networks, so it might not make sense to have a lot of that FTN configuration in SCFG. But then again, SCFG already has "FIdoNet EchoMail and NetMail" under Networks.. What about moving that from SCFG into Echocfg? :P

Nightfox

Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Nightfox to Digital Man on Wed May 11 2022 06:50 pm

have a lot of that FTN configuration in SCFG. But then again, SCFG already has "FIdoNet EchoMail and NetMail" under Networks.. What about moving that from SCFG into Echocfg? :P

That wasn't a serious request; I'm happy with where things are at in SCFG and echocfg currently.

Nightfox

Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Digital Man on Wed May 11 2022 02:06 pm

Perhaps. I don't see that as a major improvement or need, but I understand why it could be considered "better" by some people.
--
digital man (rob)

Synchronet "Real Fact" #49:
Synchronet program was named 'sbbs' instead of 'sync' to avoid conflict w/Unix Norco, CA WX: 66.1°F, 33.0% humidity, 11 mph ESE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs

:-)

$ The Millionaire $

---
￭ Synchronet ￭ Vertrauen ￭ Home of Synchronet ￭ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Nightfox to Digital Man on Wed May 11 2022 06:50 pm

Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Digital Man to The Millionaire on Wed May 11 2022 04:40 pm

How about moving ECHOCFG to SCFG? That way all configs are in one
place instead of having them separate.

Perhaps. I don't see that as a major improvement or need, but I understand why it could be considered "better" by some people.

I might be remembering wrong, but I think this question had come up before. I thought the reason for having them separate was that some sysops might choose not to add any FTN networks, so it might not make sense to have a lot of that FTN configuration in SCFG. But then again, SCFG already has "FIdoNet EchoMail and NetMail" under Networks.. What about moving that from SCFG into Echocfg? :P

Anything's possible. But EchoCfg is completely optional - it just modifies sbbsecho.ini. You could do that by hand. You don't strictly *need* EchoCfg.

SCFG on the other hand is not optional, as it modifies binary configuration (.cnf) files which you can't practically do by hand. SCFG also creates/updates database files and just generally does a lot more than echocfg does.
--
digital man (rob)

Synchronet "Real Fact" #91:
Captured chat with Wayne Bell: http://wiki.synchro.net/history:waynebell_chat Norco, CA WX: 61.1°F, 35.0% humidity, 7 mph E wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
---
■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Nightfox to Digital Man on Wed May 11 2022 06:50 pm

Anything's possible. But EchoCfg is completely optional - it just modifies sbbsecho.ini. You could do that by hand. You don't strictly *need* EchoCfg.

SCFG on the other hand is not optional, as it modifies binary configuration (.cnf) files which you can't practically do by hand. SCFG also creates/updates database files and just generally does a lot more than echocfg does.
--
digital man (rob)

Synchronet "Real Fact" #91:
Captured chat with Wayne Bell: http://wiki.synchro.net/history:waynebell_chat Norco, CA WX: 61.1°F, 35.0% humidity, 7 mph E wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs

Most BBSes DM have their ECHOCFG in their CFG file. Lots of examples: RA, Ezycom, Mystic, Renegade, etc.

$ The Millionaire $

---
￭ Synchronet ￭ Vertrauen ￭ Home of Synchronet ￭ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Digital Man on Wed May 11 2022 08:13 pm

Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Nightfox to Digital Man on Wed May 11 2022 06:50 pm

Anything's possible. But EchoCfg is completely optional - it just modifies sbbsecho.ini. You could do that by hand. You don't strictly *need* EchoCfg.

SCFG on the other hand is not optional, as it modifies binary configuration (.cnf) files which you can't practically do by hand. SCFG also creates/updates database files and just generally does a lot more than echocfg does.

Most BBSes DM have their ECHOCFG in their CFG file. Lots of examples: RA, Ezycom, Mystic, Renegade, etc.

EchoCfg is a FidoNet (FTN) EchoMail and Mailer configuration program for Synchronet's SBBSecho. Most of your cited example BBS programs don't even include an FTN EchoMail or Mailer.
--
digital man (rob)

Synchronet "Real Fact" #5:
Synchronet version 3 for Win32 development began in 1999
Norco, CA WX: 58.0°F, 39.0% humidity, 2 mph ESE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs ---
■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Digital Man on Wed May 11 2022 08:13 pm

EchoCfg is a FidoNet (FTN) EchoMail and Mailer configuration program for Synchronet's SBBSecho. Most of your cited example BBS programs don't even include an FTN EchoMail or Mailer.
--
digital man (rob)

Synchronet "Real Fact" #5:
Synchronet version 3 for Win32 development began in 1999
Norco, CA WX: 58.0°F, 39.0% humidity, 2 mph ESE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs

And neither did Synchronet at one time have a mailer.

$ The Millionaire $

---
￭ Synchronet ￭ Vertrauen ￭ Home of Synchronet ￭ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Digital Man on Thu May 12 2022 09:57 am

EchoCfg is a FidoNet (FTN) EchoMail and Mailer configuration program for
Synchronet's SBBSecho. Most of your cited example BBS programs don't even
include an FTN EchoMail or Mailer.

And neither did Synchronet at one time have a mailer.

Then I'd suspect Synchronet wouldn't have needed an EchoCfg either.

Nightfox

Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Digital Man on Thu May 12 2022 09:57 am

Then I'd suspect Synchronet wouldn't have needed an EchoCfg either.

Nightfox

---
■ Synchronet ■ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com

Well you still would need ECHOCFG for an external mailer but now that Synchronet has an internal mailer, no external mailer is needed.

$ The Millionaire $

---
￭ Synchronet ￭ Vertrauen ￭ Home of Synchronet ￭ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Nightfox on Thu May 12 2022 03:24 pm

Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Digital Man on Thu May 12 2022 09:57 am

Then I'd suspect Synchronet wouldn't have needed an EchoCfg either.

Well you still would need ECHOCFG for an external mailer but now that Synchronet has an internal mailer, no external mailer is needed.

You don't technically "need" echocfg at all, but if you're going to use SBBSecho as your echomail program, then it's a nice thing to have/use. There used to be a lot more options for FTN echomail programs to be used with Synchronet/SMB (in which case, echocfg would not be relevant), but those other options have all pretty much dried up. Still, it's conceivable that someone could use a different EchoMail program than SBBSecho and a different mailer than BinkIt, in which case, they would have no use for echocfg or sbbsecho/sbbsecho.ini.
--
digital man (rob)

Breaking Bad quote #27:
Other than Gomey here pees sitting down, here's what we know. - Hank Schrader Norco, CA WX: 83.3°F, 13.0% humidity, 6 mph SSE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs ---
■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Nightfox on Thu May 12 2022 03:24 pm

You don't technically "need" echocfg at all, but if you're going to use SBBSecho as your echomail program, then it's a nice thing to have/use. There used to be a lot more options for FTN echomail programs to be used with Synchronet/SMB (in which case, echocfg would not be relevant), but those other options have all pretty much dried up. Still, it's conceivable that someone could use a different EchoMail program than SBBSecho and a different mailer than BinkIt, in which case, they would have no use for echocfg or sbbsecho/sbbsecho.ini.
--
digital man (rob)

Breaking Bad quote #27:
Other than Gomey here pees sitting down, here's what we know. - Hank Schrader Norco, CA WX: 83.3°F, 13.0% humidity, 6 mph SSE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs

Fmail aka Fast Echomail Processor went back into production with a different author now. That would work with Synchronet?

$ The Millionaire $

---
￭ Synchronet ￭ Vertrauen ￭ Home of Synchronet ￭ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

On Wed, 11 May 2022 19:44:55 -0700
"Digital Man" <digital.man@VERT> wrote:

Anything's possible. But EchoCfg is completely optional - it just
modifies sbbsecho.ini. You could do that by hand. You don't strictly
*need* EchoCfg.

Why not add a modopts.ini option to "include echocfg link in scfg" or
something so it'll run echocfg from scfg and vice versa. At least you
wouldn't have to exist the program. It'd be like just another option.
Maybe that'll get him to STFU and move on. :)
--
End Of The Line BBS - Plano, TX
telnet endofthelinebbs.com 23
---
■ Synchronet ■ End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com

On Wed, 11 May 2022 19:44:55 -0700
"Digital Man" <digital.man@VERT> wrote:

Why not add a modopts.ini option to "include echocfg link in scfg" or something so it'll run echocfg from scfg and vice versa. At least you wouldn't have to exist the program. It'd be like just another option.
Maybe that'll get him to STFU and move on. :)
--
End Of The Line BBS - Plano, TX
telnet endofthelinebbs.com 23
---
■ Synchronet ■ End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com

STFU? GTFO!

$ The Millionaire $

---
￭ Synchronet ￭ Vertrauen ￭ Home of Synchronet ￭ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Digital Man on Thu May 12 2022 05:33 pm

Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Nightfox on Thu May 12 2022 03:24 pm

You don't technically "need" echocfg at all, but if you're going to use SBBSecho as your echomail program, then it's a nice thing to have/use. There used to be a lot more options for FTN echomail programs to be used with Synchronet/SMB (in which case, echocfg would not be relevant), but those other options have all pretty much dried up. Still, it's conceivable that someone could use a different EchoMail program than SBBSecho and a different mailer than BinkIt, in which case, they would have no use for echocfg or sbbsecho/sbbsecho.ini.

Fmail aka Fast Echomail Processor went back into production with a different author now. That would work with Synchronet?

I don't think Fmail supports SMB. I think the last tosser to support SMB that wasn't mine (SBBSFIDO or SBBSecho) was InterMail. I could be wrong. <shrug>
--
digital man (rob)

Synchronet "Real Fact" #51:
Rob Swindell was introduced to BBSing in 1982 by his older brother, Dr. Seuss Norco, CA WX: 76.3°F, 20.0% humidity, 6 mph WSW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs ---
■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Nelgin to All on Thu May 12 2022 07:47 pm

On Wed, 11 May 2022 19:44:55 -0700
"Digital Man" <digital.man@VERT> wrote:

Anything's possible. But EchoCfg is completely optional - it just
modifies sbbsecho.ini. You could do that by hand. You don't strictly *need* EchoCfg.

Why not add a modopts.ini option to "include echocfg link in scfg" or something so it'll run echocfg from scfg and vice versa. At least you wouldn't have to exist the program. It'd be like just another option.
Maybe that'll get him to STFU and move on. :)

Because that sounds like a hacky mess: modopts.ini is for JavaScript *module* options, not applicable here at all. I don't think The Millionaire is actually running SCFG or EchoCfg at all; I think he's just trying to make conversation. <shrug>
--
digital man (rob)

Breaking Bad quote #31:
Feels like one of those cones put on dogs so they don't lick their own balls. Norco, CA WX: 76.3°F, 20.0% humidity, 6 mph WSW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs ---
■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Nelgin to All on Thu May 12 2022 07:47 pm

Because that sounds like a hacky mess: modopts.ini is for JavaScript *module* options, not applicable here at all. I don't think The Millionaire is actually running SCFG or EchoCfg at all; I think he's just trying to make conversation. <shrug>
--
digital man (rob)

Breaking Bad quote #31:
Feels like one of those cones put on dogs so they don't lick their own balls. Norco, CA WX: 76.3°F, 20.0% humidity, 6 mph WSW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs

My greatest aspect is making great conversation. :-P

$ The Millionaire $

---
￭ Synchronet ￭ Vertrauen ￭ Home of Synchronet ￭ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Nelgin wrote to All <=-

Anything's possible. But EchoCfg is completely optional - it just
modifies sbbsecho.ini. You could do that by hand. You don't strictly
*need* EchoCfg.

Why not add a modopts.ini option to "include echocfg link in
scfg" or something so it'll run echocfg from scfg and vice versa.
At least you wouldn't have to exist the program. It'd be like
just another option. Maybe that'll get him to STFU and move on.

Or.... just ignore the issue completely, and move on. The dude doesn't
even use SBBS...



... Daddy, what does "now formatting drive C:" mean?
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
--- SBBSecho 3.15-Linux
* Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:123/115)
■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Nelgin to All on Thu May 12 2022 07:47 pm

Because that sounds like a hacky mess: modopts.ini is for JavaScript *module* options, not applicable here at all. I don't think The Millionaire is actually running SCFG or EchoCfg at all; I think he's just trying to make conversation. <shrug>
--
digital man (rob)

Breaking Bad quote #31:
Feels like one of those cones put on dogs so they don't lick their own balls. Norco, CA WX: 76.3°F, 20.0% humidity, 6 mph WSW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs

Are you going to delete me now?

$ The Millionaire $

---
￭ Synchronet ￭ Vertrauen ￭ Home of Synchronet ￭ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

The Millionaire wrote to Nightfox <=-

Then I'd suspect Synchronet wouldn't have needed an EchoCfg either.

Well you still would need ECHOCFG for an external mailer

No, you wouldn't. You'd use the external mailer's method of
configuration, whatever that might be.

but now that Synchronet has an internal mailer, no external
mailer is needed.

Assuming the sysop wants to use the internal mailer. Not all SBBS
systems do.



... Daddy, what does "now formatting drive C:" mean?
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
■ Synchronet ■ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

The Millionaire wrote to Digital Man <=-

Because that sounds like a hacky mess: modopts.ini is for JavaScript

*module*

options, not applicable here at all. I don't think The Millionaire is actually running SCFG or EchoCfg at all; I think he's just trying to make conversation. <shrug>

My greatest aspect is making great conversation. :-P

Except.... you don't.


... Behind every great man is an amazed mother-in-law!
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
--- SBBSecho 3.15-Linux
* Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:123/115)
■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

*module*

Except.... you don't.

... Behind every great man is an amazed mother-in-law!
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
--- SBBSecho 3.15-Linux
* Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:123/115)

Neither do you.

$ The Millionaire $

---
￭ Synchronet ￭ Vertrauen ￭ Home of Synchronet ￭ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

actually running SCFG or EchoCfg at all; I think he's just trying to make
conversation. <shrug>

My greatest aspect is making great conversation. :-P

Except.... you don't.

I'm just waiting for Godwin's Law to kick in ...
JD

--- AfterShock/Android 1.6.8
* Origin: Firecat Mobile (4:920/1.1)
■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Digital Man to Nelgin on Thu May 12 2022 18:17:35

is actually running SCFG or EchoCfg at all; I think he's just trying to make conversation. <shrug>

He seems to leave that sort of mess all over the place.

---
■ Synchronet ■ End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com

Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Gamgee to Nelgin on Thu May 12 2022 20:14:00

Or.... just ignore the issue completely, and move on. The dude doesn't
even use SBBS...

I like that option more.

---
■ Synchronet ■ End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com

Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Gamgee to Nelgin on Thu May 12 2022 20:14:00

I like that option more.

---
■ Synchronet ■ End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com

That makes two of us.

$ The Millionaire $

---
￭ Synchronet ￭ Vertrauen ￭ Home of Synchronet ￭ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Nelgin on Fri May 13 2022 12:37 pm

Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Gamgee to Nelgin on Thu May 12 2022 20:14:00

I like that option more.

That makes two of us.

So, let's summarize: You like the option more (that I suggested) to forget/ignore the "issue" and move on with no action. Even though *YOU* started the whole thread by creating the "issue". You have now changed your mind and *DON'T* think it would be a good idea to move ECHOCFG to SCFG.

Is that about right?

You are one strange person.

---
■ Synchronet ■ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Nelgin on Fri May 13 2022 12:37 pm

So, let's summarize: You like the option more (that I suggested) to forget/ignore the "issue" and move on with no action. Even though *YOU* started the whole thread by creating the "issue". You have now changed your mind and *DON'T* think it would be a good idea to move ECHOCFG to SCFG.

Is that about right?

You are one strange person.

---
■ Synchronet ■ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

You are one strange person too. Downvoting every message I write. Asking me to go on your bbs is the last thing I'd ever do. I treated you pretty decently on my Fido echo area titled "Mobile". You still treat me like crap on FSX and DOVE-NET. Which I don't think is very much fair to me. :-(

$ The Millionaire $

---
￭ Synchronet ￭ Vertrauen ￭ Home of Synchronet ￭ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Gamgee to The Millionaire on Fri May 13 2022 05:50 pm

I like that option more.

That makes two of us.

So, let's summarize: You like the option more (that I suggested) to forget/ignore the "issue" and move on with no action. Even though *YOU* started the whole thread by creating the "issue". You have now changed your mind and *DON'T* think it would be a good idea to move ECHOCFG to SCFG.

I was wondering the same thing... *boggle*

Nightfox

Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Gamgee to The Millionaire on Fri May 13 2022 05:50 pm

I was wondering the same thing... *boggle*

Nightfox

---
■ Synchronet ■ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com

That makes the two of us. :-)

$ The Millionaire $

---
￭ Synchronet ￭ Vertrauen ￭ Home of Synchronet ￭ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

The Millionaire wrote to Gamgee <=-

Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Nelgin on Fri May 13 2022 12:37 pm

So, let's summarize: You like the option more (that I suggested) to forget/ignore the "issue" and move on with no action. Even though *YOU* started the whole thread by creating the "issue". You have now changed your mind and *DON'T* think it would be a good idea to move ECHOCFG to SCFG.

Is that about right?

You are one strange person.

You are one strange person too. Downvoting every message I write.

You didn't answer the question I asked you above. Why not?

I've told you in the past why I downvote (most) of your messages. I'll continue to do so as long as you continue to do what you do in regards
to up-voting.

Asking me to go on your bbs is the last thing I'd ever do.

I don't recall asking you to "go on my BBS".

I treated you pretty decently on my Fido echo area titled "Mobile".

I don't recall that either, and it doesn't even really make sense.

You still treat me like crap on FSX and DOVE-NET. Which I don't
think is very much fair to me. :-(

I don't "treat you like crap". I ask you questions sometimes about your statements/questions, and you almost always don't bother answering. If
you do respond it's about something else, completely un-related and irrelevant. I'll keep trying, though.


... As a matter of fact, it IS a banana in my pocket.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
■ Synchronet ■ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

You didn't answer the question I asked you above. Why not?

I've told you in the past why I downvote (most) of your messages. I'll continue to do so as long as you continue to do what you do in regards
to up-voting.

I don't recall asking you to "go on my BBS".

I don't recall that either, and it doesn't even really make sense.

I don't "treat you like crap". I ask you questions sometimes about your statements/questions, and you almost always don't bother answering. If
you do respond it's about something else, completely un-related and irrelevant. I'll keep trying, though.

... As a matter of fact, it IS a banana in my pocket.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
■ Synchronet ■ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

You were talking about Trump's app on Mobile. You even told me that you carried the ftn echo area on your bbs.

$ The Millionaire $

---
￭ Synchronet ￭ Vertrauen ￭ Home of Synchronet ￭ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Nightfox on Fri May 13 2022 06:25 pm

I was wondering the same thing... *boggle*

That makes the two of us. :-)

You were also wondering why you like the option of ignoring the issue you brought up?

Nightfox

The Millionaire wrote to Gamgee <=-

I don't recall asking you to "go on my BBS".

You were talking about Trump's app on Mobile.

Ummm, no, I wasn't. I was responding to your statement "He's competing
with Twitter? Unbelieveable." I said not one single word about any
"Trump app". Your reading comprehension sucks. Go read the post again
if you need to refresh your memory.

You even told me that you carried the ftn echo area on your bbs.

I do carry that FidoNet echo on my BBS, but not sure what that has to do
with anything.

Another VERY strange (and inaccurate) post by you.


... Do you know where you are?
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
■ Synchronet ■ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

Nightfox wrote to Gamgee <=-

Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Gamgee to The Millionaire on Fri May 13 2022 05:50 pm

I like that option more.

That makes two of us.

So, let's summarize: You like the option more (that I suggested) to forget/ignore the "issue" and move on with no action. Even though *YOU* started the whole thread by creating the "issue". You have now changed your mind and *DON'T* think it would be a good idea to move ECHOCFG to SCFG.

I was wondering the same thing... *boggle*

Yeah, I honestly can't follow his "train of thought". Pretty sure he
can't, either. It's really quite strange.


... Never assume the obvious is true!
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
■ Synchronet ■ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Digital Man on Thu May 12 2022 06:30 pm

My greatest aspect is making great conversation. :-P

"great" ?


You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

DaiTengu

... Among economists, the real world is considered to be a special case.

---
■ Synchronet ■ War Ensemble BBS - The sport is war, total war - warensemble.com

Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to Digital Man on Thu May 12 2022 06:30 pm

"great" ?

You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

DaiTengu

... Among economists, the real world is considered to be a special case.

---
■ Synchronet ■ War Ensemble BBS - The sport is war, total war - warensemble.com

Making great conversation is a skill that I have learned over the years and I think I perfected it quite nicely I would say so myself. :-)

$ The Millionaire $

---
￭ Synchronet ￭ Vertrauen ￭ Home of Synchronet ￭ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

The Millionaire wrote to DaiTengu <=-

"great" ?
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

Making great conversation is a skill that I have learned over the
years and I think I perfected it quite nicely I would say so
myself. :-)

How did you do in your grade-school English classes?



... Post may contain information unsuitable for overly sensitive persons.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
■ Synchronet ■ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: The Millionaire to DaiTengu on Sat May 14 2022 05:57 pm

"great" ?

You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it
means.

Making great conversation is a skill that I have learned over the years and I think I perfected it quite nicely I would say so myself. :-)

I'm relatively sure this is your version of "Only slightly less known, is never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line!"

DaiTengu

... I shot an arrow into the air, and it stuck.

---
■ Synchronet ■ War Ensemble BBS - The sport is war, total war - warensemble.com

How did you do in your grade-school English classes?

... Post may contain information unsuitable for overly sensitive persons.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
■ Synchronet ■ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

Better than you. English was my third language not first. Remember that one. :-)

$ The Millionaire $

---
￭ Synchronet ￭ Vertrauen ￭ Home of Synchronet ￭ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

The Millionaire wrote to Gamgee <=-

How did you do in your grade-school English classes?

Better than you.

I don't think you could possibly know that for a fact.

English was my third language not first.

Really? What were the first two?

Remember that one. :-)

Sure will.



... So easy, a child could do it. Child sold separately.
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
--- SBBSecho 3.15-Linux
* Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:123/115)
■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

I don't think you could possibly know that for a fact.

Really? What were the first two?

Sure will.

... So easy, a child could do it. Child sold separately.
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
--- SBBSecho 3.15-Linux
* Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:123/115)

Russian and German.

$ The Millionaire $

---
￭ Synchronet ￭ Vertrauen ￭ Home of Synchronet ￭ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

The Millionaire wrote to Gamgee <=-

Really? What were the first two?

Russian and German.

Holy crap, you actually answered a question.

That's pretty cool, though. Were you Russian-born, and then lived in
Germany and later Canada?



... Gone crazy, be back later, please leave message.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
■ Synchronet ■ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

Holy crap, you actually answered a question.

That's pretty cool, though. Were you Russian-born, and then lived in
Germany and later Canada?

... Gone crazy, be back later, please leave message.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
■ Synchronet ■ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

I was born in California but came to Canada speaking Russian at home, English at school and my relatives speaking German.

$ The Millionaire $

---
￭ Synchronet ￭ Vertrauen ￭ Home of Synchronet ￭ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

The Millionaire wrote to Gamgee <=-

That's pretty cool, though. Were you Russian-born, and then lived in Germany and later Canada?

I was born in California but came to Canada speaking Russian at
home, English at school and my relatives speaking German.

That's really quite interesting. There's obviously more to that story,
feel free to share more info if you care to.



... MultiMail, the new multi-platform, multi-format offline reader!
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
■ Synchronet ■ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Nightfox to Digital Man on Wed May 11 2022 06:51 pm

Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Nightfox to Digital Man on Wed May 11 2022 06:50 pm

have a lot of that FTN configuration in SCFG. But then again, SCFG already has "FIdoNet EchoMail and NetMail" under Networks.. What about moving that from SCFG into Echocfg? :P

That wasn't a serious request; I'm happy with where things are at in SCFG and echocfg currently.

it's always seemed weird that there is an echocfg separate from scfg.
i know it has many more options added to it now, but i think it should all go under one roof.
---
■ Synchronet ■ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Nelgin to Digital Man on Fri May 13 2022 12:59 am

Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Digital Man to Nelgin on Thu May 12 2022 18:17:35

is actually running SCFG or EchoCfg at all; I think he's just trying to make conversation. <shrug>

He seems to leave that sort of mess all over the place.

there was actually a guy like that years ago who didn't run synchronet
and did conversation starters and why don't you's. his name was finnigan.
he was a long haul truck driver so he couldnt really run a bbs. i think he had it up a few times for like 1 day.

he was just lonely and was acting like he was a sysop i guess.
---
■ Synchronet ■ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: MRO to Nelgin on Fri May 13 2022 08:30 am

and did conversation starters and why don't you's. his name was finnigan.

I think I remember Finnigan! I haven't seen many of the crew who were around back when my board was last up, though. I remember I used to enjoy scrapping with Angus McCleod a bit.

o
(O)
BeLLy

---
■ Synchronet ■ bbs.brazi.net ■ www.brazi.net ■ WARNING: May contain nuts

Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Nightfox to Digital Man on Wed May 11 2022 06:51 pm

it's always seemed weird that there is an echocfg separate from scfg.
i know it has many more options added to it now, but i think it should all go under one roof.
---
■ Synchronet ■ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

I totally agree with you there man. :-)

$ The Millionaire $

---
￭ Synchronet ￭ Vertrauen ￭ Home of Synchronet ￭ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Belly to MRO on Tue May 17 2022 05:41 pm

Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: MRO to Nelgin on Fri May 13 2022 08:30 am

and did conversation starters and why don't you's. his name was finnigan.

I think I remember Finnigan! I haven't seen many of the crew who were around back when my board was last up, though. I remember I used to enjoy scrapping with Angus McCleod a bit.

o
(O)

some of these guys might not be with us anymore . a lot of bbs sysops have passed away in just the last 5 years.

i'm not sure what happened to mr netfoot. i think he tried to erase himself off the internet. maybe digitalman knows what happened to him.
---
■ Synchronet ■ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::

Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: MRO to Belly on Tue May 17 2022 07:34 pm

i'm not sure what happened to mr netfoot. i think he tried to erase himself off the internet. maybe digitalman knows what happened to him.

Angus is still above ground and flying planes. I plan to see him some time this year.
--
digital man (rob)

Synchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #67:
SCFG = Synchronet Configuration Utility
Norco, CA WX: 66.2°F, 75.0% humidity, 3 mph SE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
---
■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Re: Re: Feature Request: Moving ECHOCFG to SCFG
By: Digital Man to MRO on Wed May 18 2022 11:21 am

Angus is still above ground and flying planes. I plan to see him some time t

That's great to hear :)

o
(O)
BeLLy

---
■ Synchronet ■ bbs.brazi.net ■ www.brazi.net ■ WARNING: May contain nuts

On 5/18/22 11:21, Digital Man wrote:

i'm not sure what happened to mr netfoot. i think he tried to erase
himself off the internet. maybe digitalman knows what happened to
him.

Angus is still above ground and flying planes. I plan to see him some
time this year.

Good to hear, was a bit curious myself from time to time.
--
Michael J. Ryan - tracker1@roughneckbbs.com
---
￭ Synchronet ￭ Roughneck BBS - roughneckbbs.com