Is anyone using an AI product for coding with any success?
So I am wondering if anyone has had success with AI, which AI, free or
paid, and maybe if it is some AI that you are hosting yourself (and, if so, is it linux based?)?
Is anyone using an AI product for coding with any success?
I ask this question after two recent incidents:
(1) I was searching google for answers to an issue compiling an
older, abandoned FOSS C project... I am not fluent in C... and wound
up interacting with Gemini. It got me on the right track in the
sense that we fixed the compile error (caused by compiler and library updates) and got it running. (2) reading about and using Claude's
Re: Using AI for coding
By: Dumas Walker to ALL on Fri Feb 20 2026 10:17 am
Howdy,
So I am wondering if anyone has had success with AI, which AI, free
or paid, and maybe if it is some AI that you are hosting yourself
(and, if so, is it linux based?)?
So over the years, I've been experementing with AI just to see how
"good" it is.
I started with ChatGPT (year or two ago), and asked it to write an
erasure coding class for PHP - it spat out function placeholders,
and I asked it to complete each placeholder (several times, as it
had several of them) and the final code didnt work.
When I gave it the errors, it gave fixes that didnt work. I put it
it made a last callers, a userlist, an extended user list, a weather
script that also does 5 day forecast on the bottom, and a ssjs file uploader script and a script that shows top 5 crypto currency
and top 5 stocks.
it was certainly using data gathered from other users and borrowing
Is anyone using an AI product for coding with any success?
erasure coding class for PHP - it spat out function placeholders, and
I asked it to complete each placeholder (several times, as it had
several of them) and the final code didnt work.
When I gave it the errors, it gave fixes that didnt work. I put it
a guy on my irc server said that he knows some millenial nerds who
talk on switch about how great it is for web coding.
had several of them) and the final code didnt work.
When I gave it the errors, it gave fixes that didnt work. I put it
a guy on my irc server said that he knows some millenial nerds who
talk on switch about how great it is for web coding.
oops. i didn't quote correctly
i mean claude https://claude.ai/login
Dumas Walker wrote to ALL <=-
Is anyone using an AI product for coding with any success?
Dumas Walker wrote to ALL <=-
Is anyone using an AI product for coding with any success?
It's mixed for me.
Code reviews: AI does a very good job of pointing out the "gotchas"
of memory leaks, etc.
Unit test generation: AI did a good job in my latest attempt,
but it took as long as I would have taken to generate the same unit
tests. So a wash there.
Eric S. Raymond has had very good luck running old C code through
an AI to find bugs and improvements.
The who idea of "vibe coding" is going the way of CASE tools back
in the early 1990's. But, I think that AI would do a good job of
code generation if you were clear about WHAT code you wanted it to
write. Ex: "Generate a routine to merge these 2 complex lists of
items."
Is anyone using an AI product for coding with any success?
I've also used Cursor to help with some C++ tasks. I was working on an old C+
project recently (from 2007, and it was using the C++98 standard). I wanted to
modernize the code a bit (using some functionality from C++11 up through C++17
etc.). One of those changes was a bit tedious, adding the 'override' keyword to class functions that were overridden from their parent class. I asked Curso
to do that, and it was able to do it, which saved me some time. I think it missed a couple, but I added those after I noticed they were missing.
So over the years, I've been experementing with AI just to see how "good" it is.[...]
Then late last year, I tried claude, and give it the same instructions. I was super impressed, not only did it give me working code, I had a discussion with
it over parity with the data, or in seperate blocks, and forward error correction over normal parity loss. I asked it questions like why one method over the other, what is used the most, benefits and cons of each, etc.
I thought I was talking to an expert and I had code that could do all differen
implementations of parity and error correction.
Just recently, I've been using good old google search (gemini?) to build regex
expression (to actually pull apart type 2 packed messages in FTN packets). I was impressed that I never told gemini that it was fidonet but when I asked it
to create a regex to pull out the kludges and gave it a data example, it not only knew I was pulling apart fidonet packets, it gave me some other suggestio
for when data was in a different layout (eg: sometimes no origin line).
For coding, I think AI has come a long way, and where it I have found it useful, is not only has it provided working code, it provides a breakdown of what element does and why it works, pros/cons and considerations.
I can see it taking away the bulk of the work when programming.
Is anyone using an AI product for coding with any success?
I'm using Claude Code and Opus 4.6 for some pretty awesome code projects; I'm currently using an entire 1mo Pro Plan to design a website and even after just
the 1st week its looking really flipping awesome...
I'm doing a YT video series on it and can't wait to dig in m0re; w/ Claude Code, I literally want the $100/200 plan.
Is anyone using an AI product for coding with any success?
It's mixed for me.
Code reviews: AI does a very good job of pointing out the "gotchas" of memory leaks, etc.
Unit test generation: AI did a good job in my latest attempt, but it took as long as I would have taken to generate the same unit tests. So a wash there.
Eric S. Raymond has had very good luck running old C code through an AI to fin
bugs and improvements.
But, I think that AI would do a good job of code generation if you were clear about WHAT code you wanted it to write. Ex: "Generate a routine to merge thes
2 complex lists of items."
But "Write me an app do to xxx" will always fail big time.
That said, what is Cursor? That is a new one on me.
It said that it would make it much easier and encouraged me to do so. When I came back a little later and let it know the files were uploaded, it said it could see them but it had completely forgotten which exact files it wanted to see or why.
Is anyone using an AI product for coding with any success?
I ask this question after two recent incidents:
(1) I was searching google for answers to an issue compiling an older, abandoned FOSS C project... I am not fluent in C... and wound up interacting with Gemini. It got me on the right track in the sense that we fixed the compile error (caused by compiler and library updates) and got it running.
(2) reading about and using Claude's BBS, which was apparently written with the assistance of AI.
In my personal case, I found that Gemini was good up to a point, but had trouble remembering what we were working on after a while -- after we got into the weeds about squashing some memory leaks. We got sidetracked a little and then it completely forgot what we were doing. It also hallucinated some.
However, after interacting with Claude's BBS and seeing what it looks like, I have a very old C project (DOS!) that I wouldn't mind running by some other AI product to see if it could help me fix a nagging bug. I also have a few other ideas I wouldn't mind trying out.
So I am wondering if anyone has had success with AI, which AI, free or paid, and maybe if it is some AI that you are hosting yourself (and, if so, is it linux based?)?
or paid, and maybe if it is some AI that you are hosting yourself
(and, if so, is it linux based?)?
I use Gemini every now and then for scripting and chatGPT to help
out when Gemini starts to run in circles.
It is a good Idea to give Gemini or any other AI a framework before
you start. Let it know some basic rules and any additional
info about your project that could be useful to know for the AI and
repeat those in case the memory frame starts to run full ;)
Mindsurfer
I use Gemini every now and then for scripting and chatGPT to help out when
Gemini starts to run in circles.
It is a good Idea to give Gemini or any other AI a framework before you
start. Let it know some basic rules and any additional info about your
project that could be useful to know for the AI and repeat those in case
the memory frame starts to run full ;)
i've been doing a lot of this stuff and i'd have to say that gemini is a turn off and it continues to do dumb shit. grok is okay but shuts me down in the free tier. claude has been great so far. i'm doing a pac man clone with additional features. or the ai is doing it
MRO wrote to Dr. What <=-
one thing i noticed about gemini is it does sneaky things. it decides
to take out parts of the code. i ask it why and it gives a fake
excuse. it was parsing a log file and choking on one that had some guy david in it. so now when it outputs shit, it has david in there in examples. it's fucking with me apparently.
Dumas Walker wrote to DR. WHAT <=-
I ran into that some... needing to re-ask a question with more detail,
or sometimes LESS, to get better answers.
I'm chatting with the GitHub Copilot in VS Code. GPT-5.3-Codex.
That said, what is Cursor? That is a new one on me.
Cursor is an AI code editor based on Microsoft Visual Studio Code with its own
AI chatbot built into it.
It said that it would make it much easier and encouraged me to do so. When
I came back a little later and let it know the files were uploaded, it said
it could see them but it had completely forgotten which exact files it wanted to see or why.
I've not had the forgotting what we are doing issue.
I've even left the browser chat open, been distracted, got back to it a day or
two later and asked my next question and it continued on with the task at hand...
In my personal case, I found that Gemini was good up to a point, but had trouble remembering what we were working on after a while -- after we got
into the weeds about squashing some memory leaks. We got sidetracked a little and then it completely forgot what we were doing. It also hallucinated some.
i guess you get better results with a paid subscription. The Thinking or Pro Mode are much better compared to the fast mode.
And you are right, Gemini has a window or memory that it can hold. So after a while it will forget the earlier stuff from your conversation.
you can make some notes about the milestones and repeat those important infos every now and then to remind gemini and to kind of reset its memory.
i mostly use it for scripting. i guess for serious coding you should use programs like VSCode or VSCodium along with AI plugins and a subscription to a
AI API service. Or Cursor.com etc pp.
Gemini with just the Text Form can also bring you some good results, but it ha
its flaws that you can work around a bit but not really :)
The good stuff is not free.
It is a good Idea to give Gemini or any other AI a framework before you start.
Let it know some basic rules and any additional info about your project that could be useful to know for the AI and repeat those in case the memory frame starts to run full ;)
one thing i noticed about gemini is it does sneaky things. it decides toPart of the problem is that the AI only "knows" what it's been trained on.
take out parts of the code. i ask it why and it gives a fake excuse. it
was parsing a log file and choking on one that had some guy david in it.
so now when it outputs shit, it has david in there in examples. it's
That's why I laughed when Microsoft said that it was training their AI on the code in github.
I know the code in github. I have code in github and it's crap. :)
Cursor is an AI code editor based on Microsoft Visual Studio Code with itsown
AI chatbot built into it.
Nice. I reckon you need to be using MS VS for something like that to work, though? I am on linux and the code I am very curious about working with AI on is c1994 DOS code. Not sure that'd work for me in this case, but good to know for future ones.
Have you paid for each service to test it? Because i think most AI
has its flaws in the free tier. Gemini especially in thinking
mode is quite decent, but you have limited prompts there only. The
fast mode is ok for as long you don't chain to many prompts
together. I guess Gemini Pro will be alot better as well.
Is claude usable for a little coding in the free tier? i really
have to check claude out again! =) AI is changing completly
every x months. A while ago claude was nothing special at all.
MRO wrote to Dr. What <=-
one thing i noticed about gemini is it does sneaky things. it decides to take out parts of the code. i ask it why and it gives a fake excuse. it was parsing a log file and choking on one that had some
guy david in it. so now when it outputs shit, it has david in there
in examples. it's fucking with me apparently.
Part of the problem is that the AI only "knows" what it's been
trained on.
That's why I laughed when Microsoft said that it was training their
AI on the code in github. I know the code in github. I have code
in github and it's crap. :)
wonder if you could load some DOS code into it, and tell it it's for DOS, and it might be able to do something.
| Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
|---|---|
| Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
| Users: | 126 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 04:28:46 |
| Calls: | 7,775 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 9,382 |
| D/L today: |
2,375 files (138M bytes) |
| Messages: | 396,119 |
| Posted today: | 6 |