Seriously... It's UNIX. Real UNIX users keep it in text mode.
Let's get at least ONE other thread going in here, please? ;)
Khelair wrote to All <=-
Seriously... It's UNIX. Real UNIX users keep it in text
mode. Let's get at least ONE other thread going in here, please? ;)
Khelair wrote to All <=-
Seriously... It's UNIX. Real UNIX users keep it in text
mode. Let's get at least ONE other thread going in here, please? ;)
I'm downloading NetBSD as I type this. What's this Linux stuff doing on the UNIX echo? :)
... It is quite possible (after all)
Seriously... It's UNIX. Real UNIX users keep it in text mode.
Let's get at least ONE other thread going in here, please? ;)
Hmm . . . I guess my 18 years of using unix like systems as my primary environment for computing does not make me a real unix user then. With the exception of the first couple of months where I could not get X to work, I o use unix with a GUI of some type. Often I use a terminal window for file management and text processing, but too much of my life is spent in a web browser, or image editor to want to be stuck with strictly a command line. Heck, I am even using gvim instead of vi now. My only problem with the graphical environments is that they are not consistent.
I'm downloading NetBSD as I type this. What's this Linux stuff doing on the UNIX echo? :)
Re: Ack; another thread, please!
By: Folsom to Khelair on Wed Aug 14 2013 10:28:33
Hmm . . . I guess my 18 years of using unix like systems as my primary environment for computing does not make me a real unix user then. With th exception of the first couple of months where I could not get X to work, use unix with a GUI of some type. Often I use a terminal window for file management and text processing, but too much of my life is spent in a web browser, or image editor to want to be stuck with strictly a command line Heck, I am even using gvim instead of vi now. My only problem with the graphical environments is that they are not consistent.
Sorry, it was a bad attempt, I guess, at who's the biggest geek
humor. I wasn't serious. I'm at ~20 years, too. I wasn't REALLY trying
to whip it out and find out whose was bigger, it was a joke.
Folsom wrote to Khelair <=-
Hmm . . . I guess my 18 years of using unix like systems as my primary environment for computing does not make me a real unix user then.
Sorry, it was a bad attempt, I guess, at who's the biggest geek
humor. I wasn't serious. I'm at ~20 years, too. I wasn't REALLY trying to whip it out and find out whose was bigger, it was a joke.
I apologize too. I regretted the tone of that reply just minutes after sending it. Although I did not get it accross very well, the actual communication that I wanted to make was that I think user desktops should be GUI environments-even if the only think that runs is a bunch of terminals.
I'm downloading NetBSD as I type this. What's this Linux stuff doing on the UNIX echo? :)
I would love to use a GUI if it was as stable as not using one. But in my experience it is definitely not, and I'm all about stability.
I'm downloading NetBSD as I type this. What's this Linux stuff doing
on the UNIX echo? :)
*cackle* THAT is what I'm talkin' about. Hell, the server I'm talking this on is a headless OpenBSD 5.x box. :D
I would love to use a GUI if it was as stable as not using one. But in
my experience it is definitely not, and I'm all about stability.
That, my friend, is because you haven't used w9wm-arfonzo. :D
/me hides.
That depends - EMACS or vi? :)
Re: Re: Ack; another thread, please!
By: art to Access Denied on Fri Aug 16 2013 08:41 am
I would love to use a GUI if it was as stable as not using one. But in
my experience it is definitely not, and I'm all about stability.
That, my friend, is because you haven't used w9wm-arfonzo. :D
It's usually not the window manager or desktop environment that is at fault. is Xorg and all the crap it's running in the background that hogs resources, and eventually slow down if not lock up your servers (in my past experience, anyways).
As a general rule, I do not allow X servers on any server. Even if I have an X application that I launch from a server, it should run on my display server, not on the real server. I have had several consultants not like my response when they wanted to install and run some management tool on the production server.
Here is my gang sign
_ .-.
|.| |.| .-.
|-| |-| |.|
|-| |-|-|-|
| | ; | |-|
| |/ ' ; |
/| ;
| \ ;
\ ` '
\ |
| |
| |
And how is the installation and running of those door games coming along, fellas? If you haven't started yet, I wish you good luck. :)
I would much prefer to run my system on OpenBSD, but sometimes BSD just does do what you want it to do in the BBS realm.
Yeah, that's kind of a biyatch. I just haven't had the time or effort to throw into the BBS+dosbox configuration. Initial attempts failed quick though, your insinuation is correct. I'm alright with that, though. I mean it'd be great to have more users connecting for such things, but my BBS's mission really doesn't depend on doors at all. The mail subsystem being rather horked, however, and seemingly only when compiled on OpenBSD... Well that just sucks.
On the other hand, Linux works quite well with the built-in dosemu support i Synchronet. Dosbox (as well as doscmd if that even works) won't allow multip nodes to play at the same time in BSD.
Then again, if your intent has nothing to do with doors, then BSD would work as long as you can get everything else working right.
Sorry, it was a bad attempt, I guess, at who's the biggest geek
humor. I wasn't serious. I'm at ~20 years, too. I wasn't REALLY trying
to whip it out and find out whose was bigger, it was a joke.
That depends - EMACS or vi? :)
As a general rule, I do not allow X servers on any server. Even if I have an application that I launch from a server, it should run on my display server, not on the real server. I have had several consultants not like my response when they wanted to install and run some management tool on the production server.
<Chris quietly tucks his ruler away...>
:-)
That said, when I'm usually dealing with headless systems (most of the time) I'm actually doing ssh sessions from a windows pc. I usually need a cold shower by the end of the day....
At home, I'm usually using KDE plus Konsole for much of the admin stuff I do
I haven't checked out KDE for awhile, but honestly I've not been too hap with debian + GNOME for awhile now due to some ridiculous sound issues I've been having. I might update my desktop system soon and see what I can do ab a new setup on here.I recommend KDE for the most part. It probably is a bit more than what a lot of people need, but so far it seems to have come a long way over the few minor releases. The activities I have no use for right now, but I can see it being handy at some point.
Re: Re: Ack; another thread, please!
By: Khelair to Chris on Thu Aug 29 2013 10:52 pm
I haven't checked out KDE for awhile, but honestly I've not been too hap with debian + GNOME for awhile now due to some ridiculous sound issues I've been having. I might update my desktop system soon and see what I can do ab a new setup on here.I recommend KDE for the most part. It probably is a bit more than what a lot of people need, but so far it seems to have come a long way over the
few minor releases. The activities I have no use for right now, but I can see it being handy at some point.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Perrault
The Diamond Mine BBS
telnet://bbs.dmine.net
The Programmers' SIG @ DelphiForums
http://www.delphiforums.com/prosig
------------------------------------------------------------------
I recommend KDE for the most part. It probably is a bit more than what a lo of people need, but so far it seems to have come a long way over the few min releases. The activities I have no use for right now, but I can see it being handy at some point.
KDE is pretty cool but very bloated like Windoze is. That's the only problem with it.
$ The Millionaire $
Park Avenue Place
Surrey, B.C., Canada
the.millionaire@parkave.synchro.net
KDE is pretty cool but very bloated like Windoze is. That's the only problem with it.
The KDE footprint is pretty big, but so long as you have a moderately built machine I have no problem recommending it. Obviously for a real slim
machine (in terms of resources) I wouldn't try to wedge it in there when there are decent lightweight Desktops/WMs available.
actually i prefer the cli to any linux gui except for maybe xfce.e.
all my computers are dual core or better so it's not a performance preferenc
Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
---|---|
Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
Users: | 106 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 00:07:38 |
Calls: | 5,846 |
Files: | 8,496 |
D/L today: |
13 files (7,048K bytes) |
Messages: | 343,202 |