Hi.. thanks for the msg! A guy in our LUG is die hard FreeBSD and after his demos of Ports I could definitely see myself using it --- though Ports to me seems to work as well as apt on Ubuntu :)
As for Rob's Unix guide, it is great... I've used it numerous times to get Synchronet loaded on Linux, and like you I do have to install a few packages which isn't difficult at all with apt.
I guess one thing I'd love to see is a control panel for Linux/Unix like the Windows version of Sync uses. I first setup Sync on Windwos 2000 in 2000 an the Control Panel was nice. I can get the same stuff via command line optio in Linux, but having a GUI interface or even web-based interface would be co But Sync on *Nix rocks!
I think Ubuntu is coughing on the gmake statement... the ones found in the instructions given.
I think Ubuntu is coughing on the gmake statement... the ones found in the instructions given.
I use ubuntu 9 and the gnu make is installed as make.
but you need to copy the GNUmakefile to makefile.
you also need to install some other packages also, like ncurses and
some others witch I forget off the top of my head.
Where do I get these extra files that I need??
apt-get install {name of package}
also, you have to compile as ROOT.
apt-get install {name of package}
also, you have to compile as ROOT.
How do U compile as root??
How do U compile as root??
sudo apt-get install {name of package}
Then it will prompt you for your administer's password. Type that in and you're golden.
I use ubuntu 9 and the gnu make is installed as make.
but you need to copy the GNUmakefile to makefile.
you also need to install some other packages also, like ncurses and
some others witch I forget off the top of my head.
What am I installing here... that file some messages back or the files for synchronet??
I don't know. You asked the question. Probably the file some messages back, because you can't install Synchronet via apt-get, I don't think. Unless some made a RPM package for it and got it put in the repos. I'm unaware of that happening, though.
Re: BSD
By: Ib_Joe to Access Denied on Sat Jan 09 2010 06:53 pm
What am I installing here... that file some messages back or the files fo synchronet??
I don't know. You asked the question. Probably the file some messages back, because you can't install Synchronet via apt-get, I don't think. Unless some made a RPM package for it and got it put in the repos. I'm unaware of that happening, though.
axisd
Maybe Linux isn't the best choice for this person...?
Maybe Linux isn't the best choice for this person...?
Maybe Linux isn't the best choice for this person...?
Y be an ass and say that.
I have opened the box and I'm trying to learn the OS... I don't have the tim to dedicate 100% but I am learning.
Barring any assholes, I have always found the Syncronet community quite helpful.
If you have something to say why not encourage or be uplifting... It takes t same amount of energy to be/do either.
Re: BSD
By: Atari X to Access Denied on Sun Jan 10 2010 01:44 pm
Maybe Linux isn't the best choice for this person...?
Well if everyone always said that, noone would be using Linux. Everyone's go start somewhere, I guess. Though jumping right into it and starting servers out of the gate, might be a bad idea. Learn the operating system first, then worry about other things.
axisd
I'm not being an ass - I'm being realistic. Linux is a great operating syst - believe it or not, I have been a Linux advocate at LSU for quite a few yea now. I'm one of the reasons that LSU uses PDF files when distributing materials to students online instead of vendor-proprietary formats.
But, that said, I am a realist. Linux will provide you with little benefit you are not familiar with using it. In fact, you are setting more obstacles in front of yourself if you are not familiar with Linux (intimately) and wit running SynchoNet.
I suggested that maybe Linux wasn't for this individual because perhaps attempting one major technical task was easier than attempting several technical tasks in a row. Linux is easier to configure now than ever before but that still doesn't make it easy.
apt-get install {name of package}
also, you have to compile as ROOT.
Okay, I have a few questions.
How do I get into root. I have started some reading and I think it has something to do with sudo.
I tried your apt-get install command and it said I did not have the proper permision. There is a line in the install process that says the same...
ln -s /sbbs/lib/cryptlib/linux.release/*.so /usr/lib
If we can take it from this point I may be able to compile sbbs
Re: BSD
By: Ib Joe to Sam Alexander on Fri Jan 08 2010 10:52 am
I think Ubuntu is coughing on the gmake statement... the ones found in the instructions given.
I use ubuntu 9 and the gnu make is installed as make.
but you need to copy the GNUmakefile to makefile.
Re: BSD
By: Ib_Joe to Corey on Tue Jan 12 2010 07:46 am
Okay, I have a few questions.
How do I get into root. I have started some reading and I think it has something to do with sudo.
I tried your apt-get install command and it said I did not have the prope permision. There is a line in the install process that says the same...
ln -s /sbbs/lib/cryptlib/linux.release/*.so /usr/lib
If we can take it from this point I may be able to compile sbbs
In linux, the 'root' user is the superuser, the system administrator... I haven't paid much attention, but I know that ubuntu is a rootless dist, whic may complicate things if that's what you use.
If you type 'su' and press enter, then it asks for a password, you have just become the root user and can do what you need to do. You can also 'sudo' ea command to run a command as root. Example:
sudo apt-get install <packagename>
It will ask your password and install it if you have permission to execute commands as root.
That being said, try to make your symbolic link by preceding your "ln -s" instruction with "sudo", e.g.:
sudo ln -s /path/to/original/file /path/to/new/symbolic/link
Let me know if that all works out for ya.
esc(montereybbs/demonic/mimic)
Re: BSD
By: Corey to Ib Joe on Fri Jan 08 2010 01:46 pm
Re: BSD
By: Ib Joe to Sam Alexander on Fri Jan 08 2010 10:52 am
I think Ubuntu is coughing on the gmake statement... the ones found in the instructions given.
I use ubuntu 9 and the gnu make is installed as make.
but you need to copy the GNUmakefile to makefile.
make -f GNUmakefile should work just fine. NO need to copy or rename GNUmakefile.
digital man
Snapple "Real Fact" #33:
Termites eat through wood two times faster when listening to rock music!
If you type 'su' and press enter, then it asks for a password, you have
just become the root user and can do what you need to do. You can also 'sudo' each command to run a command as root. Example:
sudo apt-get install <packagename>
apt-get install {name of package}
also, you have to compile as ROOT.
Caput meum major podice meo.
This message has ended, go in peace...
Re: BSD
By: Corey to Ib_Joe on Fri Jan 08 2010 07:36 pm
apt-get install {name of package}
also, you have to compile as ROOT.
Caput meum major podice meo.
This message has ended, go in peace...
I think I fond out how to logon in root... still didn't compile. :(
I did find a local user group I may show up to the local AA meating after I come back from my next work cycle.
:)
Joe
Re: BSD
By: Digital Man to Corey on Tue Jan 12 2010 06:20 pm
Re: BSD
By: Corey to Ib Joe on Fri Jan 08 2010 01:46 pm
Re: BSD
By: Ib Joe to Sam Alexander on Fri Jan 08 2010 10:52 am
I think Ubuntu is coughing on the gmake statement... the ones
found in the instructions given.
I use ubuntu 9 and the gnu make is installed as make.
but you need to copy the GNUmakefile to makefile.
make -f GNUmakefile should work just fine. NO need to copy or rename GNUmakefile.
digital man
Snapple "Real Fact" #33:
Termites eat through wood two times faster when listening to rock music!
hmm, never thought of that.
now how do I rename all the synch files to lowercase?
Re: BSD
By: Corey to Digital Man on Tue Jan 12 2010 06:56 pm
Re: BSD
By: Digital Man to Corey on Tue Jan 12 2010 06:20 pm
Re: BSD
By: Corey to Ib Joe on Fri Jan 08 2010 01:46 pm
Re: BSD
By: Ib Joe to Sam Alexander on Fri Jan 08 2010 10:52 am
I think Ubuntu is coughing on the gmake statement... the ones found in the instructions given.
I use ubuntu 9 and the gnu make is installed as make.
but you need to copy the GNUmakefile to makefile.
make -f GNUmakefile should work just fine. NO need to copy or rename GNUmakefile.
digital man
Snapple "Real Fact" #33:
Termites eat through wood two times faster when listening to rock musi
hmm, never thought of that.
now how do I rename all the synch files to lowercase?
Deuce posted a command-line (to you, iirc) using 'mmv' to do this.
digital man
Snapple "Real Fact" #107:
You burn more calories sleeping than watching TV.
whats the errors?
did you install ncurses?
Re: BSD
By: Corey to Ib_Joe on Wed Jan 13 2010 08:24 am
whats the errors?
did you install ncurses?
seems like ubuntu is more trouble than it's worth, if ya'll would use a real *nix os (freebsd) you would'nt have this trouble, I've never heard of a unix box you coul'd utilize root in easily.. buillshit.
--
Tim Smith (Mrproper)
WarZone BBS: warzone.synchro.net
BBSsearch : http://search.synchro.net
I have been playing around with Ubuntu as of late. I have tried to use Rob's guid to install Synchronet on my Ubuntu machine and I cannot seem to make it fly.
I think Ubuntu is coughing on the gmake statement... the ones found in the instructions given.
Do U have any suggestions???
seems like ubuntu is more trouble than it's worth, if ya'll would use a real *nix os (freebsd) you would'nt have this trouble, I've never heard of a unix box you coul'd utilize root in easily.. buillshit.
On 1/13/2010 5:53 PM, mrproper wrote:
seems like ubuntu is more trouble than it's worth, if ya'll would use a re *nix os (freebsd) you would'nt have this trouble, I've never heard of a un box you coul'd utilize root in easily.. buillshit.
Until you want to run some multi-user dos doors on your bbs.. ;)
I will use the following when I want root.
sudo su
Though it's considered better form to sudo those processes that need it.
sudo md /sbbs
sudo chown YOURUSERNAME /sbbs
proceed until you get done with the build...
create a BBS, sbbs or synchronet user
sudo chown sbbs /sbbs
setup the services to launch. I think you need build-essential and ncurses-dev to build synchronet in Ubuntu, not sure what else.
--
Michael J. Ryan - http://tracker1.info/
I had no problem finding root. didn't even have to ROOT for it... lol
I did have problems finding out how to install the extra dev stuff synch needs.
In linux, the 'root' user is the superuser, the system administrator... I haven't paid much attention, but I know that ubuntu is a rootless dist, which may complicate things if that's what you use.
If you type 'su' and press enter, then it asks for a password, you have
just become the root user and can do what you need to do. You can also 'sudo' each command to run a command as root. Example:
Re: BSD
By: esc to Ib_Joe on Tue Jan 12 2010 07:15 pm
In linux, the 'root' user is the superuser, the system administrator... haven't paid much attention, but I know that ubuntu is a rootless dist, which may complicate things if that's what you use.
If you type 'su' and press enter, then it asks for a password, you have just become the root user and can do what you need to do. You can also 'sudo' each command to run a command as root. Example:
I was able to get into the root... I still had errors during the compile, I would just assume that that is not a good thing.
Moreover, and more importantly, when I finish the process I cannot run scfg sbbs.
I'll try a recompile and upload the errors for all to see.
Thanx for your help thus far. I have learned alot.
Moreover, and more importantly, when I finish the process I cannot run scfg or sbbs.
I was able to get into the root... I still had errors during the compile, I would just assume that that is not a good thing.
Moreover, and more importantly, when I finish the process I cannot run scfg or sbbs.
because you can't install Synchronet via apt-get, I don't think. Unless someone made a RPM package
for it and got it put in the repos. I'm unaware
of that happening, though.
LOL, good.. I just thought it to be awful strange that a linux box would'nt have a root login.. just don't sount like a linux I would want to run.
Moreover, and more importantly, when I finish the process I cannot run sc or sbbs.
try ./sbbs or ./scfg instead if you have'nt already.
I, for one, have been working on a debian package for Synchronet, though I don't know that it'll make it in to the official repositories... (For instance, installations to /opt is no longer acceptable in the Debian repository...)
I, for one, have been working on a debian package for Synchronet,
though I don't know that it'll make it in to the official repositories... (For instance, installations to /opt is no longer acceptable in the Debian repository...)
Why would you want to install it to /opt?
Why not either install it to your home directory,
or have it make it's own home directory
(maybe with a warning label that it's going to create a new user, or something)?
Re: BSD
By: Digital Man to Corey on Wed Jan 13 2010 01:16 pm
Re: BSD
By: Corey to Digital Man on Tue Jan 12 2010 06:56 pm
Re: BSD
By: Digital Man to Corey on Tue Jan 12 2010 06:20 pm
Re: BSD
By: Corey to Ib Joe on Fri Jan 08 2010 01:46 pm
Re: BSD
By: Ib Joe to Sam Alexander on Fri Jan 08 2010 10:52 am
I think Ubuntu is coughing on the gmake statement... the
ones found in the instructions given.
I use ubuntu 9 and the gnu make is installed as make.
but you need to copy the GNUmakefile to makefile.
make -f GNUmakefile should work just fine. NO need to copy or rename GNUmakefile.
digital man
Snapple "Real Fact" #33:
Termites eat through wood two times faster when listening to rock musi
hmm, never thought of that.
now how do I rename all the synch files to lowercase?
Deuce posted a command-line (to you, iirc) using 'mmv' to do this.
I must have missed it. whats the command again?
Do U have any suggestions???
sudo apt-get install build-essential
...
make ...
...
sudo ln -s ...
As to the rest... ask when you get there...
--
I use ubuntu 9 and the gnu make is installed as make.
but you need to copy the GNUmakefile to makefile.
make -f GNUmakefile should work just fine. NO need to copy or rename GNUmakefile.
digital man
hmm, never thought of that.
now how do I rename all the synch files to lowercase?
I am about 75% switched over. even found a linux ELF version of my IREX 2.29
Re: BSD
By: Digital Man to Corey on Tue Jan 12 2010 06:20 pm
I use ubuntu 9 and the gnu make is installed as make.
but you need to copy the GNUmakefile to makefile.
make -f GNUmakefile should work just fine. NO need to copy or rename GNUmakefile.
digital man
This drives me nuts... I didn't see this in your setup instructions...
Re: BSD
By: Corey to Digital Man on Tue Jan 12 2010 06:56 pm
hmm, never thought of that.
now how do I rename all the synch files to lowercase?
I am about 75% switched over. even found a linux ELF version of my IREX 2
where did U find the termcap file it looks for??
Thanx
Re: BSD
By: Digital Man to Corey on Tue Jan 12 2010 06:20 pm
I use ubuntu 9 and the gnu make is installed as make.
but you need to copy the GNUmakefile to makefile.
make -f GNUmakefile should work just fine. NO need to copy or rename GNUmakefile.
This drives me nuts... I didn't see this in your setup instructions...
Re: BSD
By: Ib Joe to Digital Man on Tue Feb 02 2010 12:51 am
Re: BSD
By: Digital Man to Corey on Tue Jan 12 2010 06:20 pm
I use ubuntu 9 and the gnu make is installed as make.
but you need to copy the GNUmakefile to makefile.
make -f GNUmakefile should work just fine. NO need to copy or rename GNUmakefile.
This drives me nuts... I didn't see this in your setup instructions...
You don't normally need to use the '-f' option.
digital man
Snapple "Real Fact" #126:
A pigeon's feathers are heavier than its bones.
To all my detractors... eat shit and die
I got SBBS to compile and I am now writing this message on the linix version SBBS.
I'm going to slowly widdle at things to make it work the way I want it to.
I'll take a deep breath and move on from this point.
Thanx to those who gave me some pointers
Re: Ubuntu
By: Ib Joe to All on Fri Feb 05 2010 02:45 am
To all my detractors... eat shit and die
I got SBBS to compile and I am now writing this message on the linix vers SBBS.
I'm going to slowly widdle at things to make it work the way I want it to
I'll take a deep breath and move on from this point.
Thanx to those who gave me some pointers
linux is great fun for all ages.
To all my detractors... eat shit and die
I got SBBS to compile and I am now writing this message on the linix
version of SBBS.
I'm going to slowly widdle at things to make it work the way I want it to.
I'll take a deep breath and move on from this point.
To all my detractors... eat shit and die
I got SBBS to compile and I am now writing this message on the linix version SBBS.
I'm going to slowly widdle at things to make it work the way I want it to.
Re: Ubuntu
By: Ib Joe to All on Fri Feb 05 2010 02:45 am
To all my detractors... eat shit and die
that's nice
I got SBBS to compile and I am now writing this message on the linix version of SBBS.
linux?
I'm going to slowly widdle at things to make it work the way I want it to
ok
I'll take a deep breath and move on from this point.
don't breath too hard, you'll suck in a bug.
--
Tim Smith (Mrproper)
WarZone BBS: warzone.synchro.net
BBSsearch : http://search.synchro.net
Re: Ubuntu
By: Ib Joe to All on Fri Feb 05 2010 02:45:14
To all my detractors... eat shit and die
Harsh!
I got SBBS to compile and I am now writing this message on the linix vers SBBS.
Linux.
I'm going to slowly widdle at things to make it work the way I want it to
Whittle.
echicken
electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com - 416-273-7230
or they mean Minix?I got SBBS to compile and I am now writing this message on the linix vLinux.
I just got Ubuntu (32bit version), and I'm a bit out of my comfort zone here---
because I have been using nothing more than Windows.
I am using Windows 7 (32 bit), and I want to install it. Now I already tried
it via booting from the cd (demo) only without installing the software. Before
I install it in it's own partition (drive D) I am wondering if I install it in
Windows 7 first will this damage my ability to boot back into Windows?
I guess what I am wanting to say is that if, and when I decide to do a full install, and I uninstall it from Windows 7 will it hurt my main boot file?
I'm very new to this whole linux thing, and I just don't want to damage my system in any way.
Can you folks also tell me some of the do's, and don'ts before I take this on?
Thanks ahead of time.
---
� Synchronet � Paranor BBS 1989-2011(revived). telnet://jaio.no-ip.org:23 Website: http://www.j
The best advice I can give in your situation is to install VMWare player
or virtualbox and have at it as a virtual machine. Once you're
comfortable with whatever flavor of Linux you choose, you can (later on) either dual-boot or do a complete switch to a Linux environment.
(I realize that 'integrity' and 'Windows' is an oxymoron in some
circles, but that's a different discussion.)
I just got Ubuntu (32bit version), and I'm a bit out of my comfort zone her because I have been using nothing more than Windows.
I am using Windows 7 (32 bit), and I want to install it. Now I already trie it via booting from the cd (demo) only without installing the software. Befo I install it in it's own partition (drive D) I am wondering if I install it Windows 7 first will this damage my ability to boot back into Windows?
I guess what I am wanting to say is that if, and when I decide to do a full install, and I uninstall it from Windows 7 will it hurt my main boot file?
I'm very new to this whole linux thing, and I just don't want to damage my system in any way.
Can you folks also tell me some of the do's, and don'ts before I take this
Thanks ahead of time.
I just got Ubuntu (32bit version), and I'm a bit out of my comfort zone her because I have been using nothing more than Windows.
I am using Windows 7 (32 bit), and I want to install it. Now I already trie it via booting from the cd (demo) only without installing the software. Befo I install it in it's own partition (drive D) I am wondering if I install it Windows 7 first will this damage my ability to boot back into Windows?
I guess what I am wanting to say is that if, and when I decide to do a full install, and I uninstall it from Windows 7 will it hurt my main boot file?
I'm very new to this whole linux thing, and I just don't want to damage my system in any way.
Can you folks also tell me some of the do's, and don'ts before I take this
Thanks ahead of time.
Snod wrote to Mikesla <=-
Re: Ubuntu
By: Mikesla to All on Thu Nov 10 2011 06:32:06
I just got Ubuntu (32bit version), and I'm a bit out of my comfort zone her because I have been using nothing more than Windows.
I am using Windows 7 (32 bit), and I want to install it. Now I already trie it via booting from the cd (demo) only without installing the software. Befo I install it in it's own partition (drive D) I am wondering if I install it Windows 7 first will this damage my ability to boot back into Windows?
I guess what I am wanting to say is that if, and when I decide to do a full install, and I uninstall it from Windows 7 will it hurt my main boot file?
I'm very new to this whole linux thing, and I just don't want to damage my system in any way.
Can you folks also tell me some of the do's, and don'ts before I take this
Thanks ahead of time.
Ubuntu now has an installer that works like any other program. If you
get tired of it you can uninstall it like a regular program. I have
been using it for several months now with no problems on XP.
Snod wrote to Mikesla <=-
Re: Ubuntu
By: Mikesla to All on Thu Nov 10 2011 06:32:06
I just got Ubuntu (32bit version), and I'm a bit out of my comfort zone because I have been using nothing more than Windows.
I am using Windows 7 (32 bit), and I want to install it. Now I already t it via booting from the cd (demo) only without installing the software. B I install it in it's own partition (drive D) I am wondering if I install Windows 7 first will this damage my ability to boot back into Windows?
I guess what I am wanting to say is that if, and when I decide to do a f install, and I uninstall it from Windows 7 will it hurt my main boot file
I'm very new to this whole linux thing, and I just don't want to damage system in any way.
Can you folks also tell me some of the do's, and don'ts before I take th
Thanks ahead of time.
Ubuntu now has an installer that works like any other program. If you get tired of it you can uninstall it like a regular program. I have been using it for several months now with no problems on XP.
I did install it using the windows installer. I'm so new to this that it's down right embarrassing. It's like the good old dos days all over again, I guess thats one thing in my favor, I was raised on dos.
Thanks!
------------------------
Paranor BBS: telnet://jaio.no-ip.org:23
Website: http://www.justallinone.com
Jaio Newsgroup Forum: http://usenet.justallinone.com ------------------------
... Mikesla uses Multi-Mail, should you? Probably not...
Jeff Clayton wrote to Mikesla <=-
Re: Re: Ubuntu
By: Mikesla to Snod on Thu Nov 10 2011 19:19:00
Snod wrote to Mikesla <=-
Re: Ubuntu
By: Mikesla to All on Thu Nov 10 2011 06:32:06
I just got Ubuntu (32bit version), and I'm a bit out of my comfort zone because I have been using nothing more than Windows.
I am using Windows 7 (32 bit), and I want to install it. Now I already t it via booting from the cd (demo) only without installing the software. B I install it in it's own partition (drive D) I am wondering if I install Windows 7 first will this damage my ability to boot back into Windows?
I guess what I am wanting to say is that if, and when I decide to do a f install, and I uninstall it from Windows 7 will it hurt my main boot file
I'm very new to this whole linux thing, and I just don't want to damage system in any way.
Can you folks also tell me some of the do's, and don'ts before I take th
Thanks ahead of time.
Ubuntu now has an installer that works like any other program. If you get tired of it you can uninstall it like a regular program. I have been using it for several months now with no problems on XP.
I did install it using the windows installer. I'm so new to this that it's down right embarrassing. It's like the good old dos days all over again, I guess thats one thing in my favor, I was raised on dos.
Thanks!
Being a DOS user has paid off for me many times even on these new
Windows systems.
A life devoid of integrity and fairness is no life at all!
MGH AKA Jeff Clayton
Re: BSD
By: Ib Joe to Digital Man on Tue Feb 02 2010 12:51 am
Re: BSD
By: Digital Man to Corey on Tue Jan 12 2010 06:20 pm
I use ubuntu 9 and the gnu make is installed as make.
but you need to copy the GNUmakefile to makefile.
make -f GNUmakefile should work just fine. NO need to copy or rename GNUmakefile.
This drives me nuts... I didn't see this in your setup instructions...
You don't normally need to use the '-f' option.
digital man
Snapple "Real Fact" #126:
A pigeon's feathers are heavier than its bones.
I hear you, it drove me nuts too, and I could swear I didn't see it inThis drives me nuts... I didn't see this in your setupI use ubuntu 9 and the gnu make is installed as make.make -f GNUmakefile should work just fine. NO need to copy or
but you need to copy the GNUmakefile to makefile.
rename GNUmakefile.
instructions...
Good grief, Linux is *SUPPOSED TO BE BETTER*, not more aggrivating!
Good grief, Linux is *SUPPOSED TO BE BETTER*, not more aggrivating!
Re: BSD
By: John Guillory to Ronald Reid on Tue Jul 10 2012 03:03 pm
Good grief, Linux is *SUPPOSED TO BE BETTER*, not more aggrivating!
I've never understood where this myth comes from.
Good grief, Linux is *SUPPOSED TO BE BETTER*, not more
aggrivating!
I've never understood where this myth comes from.
apples use bsd. from thier iphones to tablets to desktops.
Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
---|---|
Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
Users: | 106 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 10:04:37 |
Calls: | 5,846 |
Files: | 8,496 |
Messages: | 343,180 |