niter3 wrote to All <=-
I'm considering moving off of ESXi for home to XCP-NG.
I understand Proxmox seems to be the clear popular alternative, but it also appears to require more baby sitting. Is this true?
I want an alternative I don't need to mess around with. Something that just runs without constantly repairing or fixing.
I'm considering moving off of ESXi for home to XCP-NG.
I understand Proxmox seems to be the clear popular alternative, but it
also appears to require more baby sitting. Is this true?
I want an alternative I don't need to mess around with. Something that
just runs without constantly repairing or fixing.
What are some others using?
telnet://bbs.roonsbbs.hu:1212 <<=-
I'm considering moving off of ESXi for home to XCP-NG.
I'd be curious to hear about your experiences with xcp-ng, I'd love to find out more.
On 16 Apr 23 06:58:09, Niter3 said the following to All:
I'm considering moving off of ESXi for home to XCP-NG.
I've ran Exsi here for years now... mind if I ask why move away from something that "just works" ?
niter3 wrote to Atreyu <=-
Broadcom purchase and their plans to push subacriptikn amd eventually
to get rid of perpetual licensing.
They definitely made it clear that small and medium businesses are not part of their planning -- the Broadcom CEO stated that they get 80% of their revenues from a handful of large enterprise clients.
That's a shame, because some of their vCenter essentials tools are a
nice fit for SMB - 6 CPU, 3 physical servers and up to 100 VMs is a good size for most small businesses.
niter3 wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
I just migrated over to Proxmox. Keeping my ESXi backups in case there needed.
Welcome to the club! WHen you start playing with containers, Proxmox
gets pretty fun in a homelab. I had a Ubuntu server running Docker but moved to separate containers for some of my apps.
Check out https://tteck.github.io/Proxmox/ for some great scripts to enhance proxmox, and check out TechnoTim on Youtube - he's got a whole Proxmox series.
niter3 wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
I'm actually considering swapping out my server for a mini pc. There is mini pc's that now have more cores and threads then my current setup.
It would be nice to reduce my foot print and wattage....
I've ran Exsi here for years now... mind if I ask why move away from something that "just works" ?
They definitely made it clear that small and medium businesses are not part of their planning -- the Broadcom CEO stated that they get 80% of their revenues from a handful of large enterprise clients.
I've ran Exsi here for years now... mind if I ask why move away from something that "just works" ?
Same. I first installed it when 6.5.0 (2017 or earlier maybe?) dropped and haven't had to mess with it since. Maybe if I ran some actual servers that generated income in vast amounts, I'd consider possibly upgrading or looking at what's newer out there, but for BBSing in general as long as it works and
servethehome.com has a nice blog and a youtube channel; the author's
been focused on what he called tinyminimicro servers - those commodity 1 liter sized ultra-small form factor PCs. They make great home servers. Some them max out at 16gb of RAM, which is a little low for virtualization, but they cluster nicely.
Atreyu wrote to Accession <=-
Not messing with things is why my board has remained on-line without problems for...... decades.
Not messing with things is why my board has remained on-line without problems for...... decades.
I suppose I've been fortunate - I started realitycheckBBS in 1991, and
made a couple of changes, from Telegard to Maximus to Synchronet, then
DOS to OS/2 and Windows, and from bare metal desktops to laptops and now virtualization. at no point have I lost *everything* and needed to start
Atreyu wrote to Poindexter Fortran <=-
Not messing with things is why my board has remained on-line without problems for...... decades.
I suppose I've been fortunate - I started realitycheckBBS in 1991, and made a couple of changes, from Telegard to Maximus to Synchronet, then
DOS to OS/2 and Windows, and from bare metal desktops to laptops and now virtualization. at no point have I lost *everything* and needed to start
But you are not changing your BBS software like underwear or putting up multiple boards for the sake of running multiple boards.
I've done some of that but it has not really been for the sake of running multiple boards. I brought this one up because Synchronet was still under development and is linux-native, but I left my original DOS BBS online because there were not many like it left (it may be the only GT Power board now) and it runs DOS doors easier.
I added a third board later because I wanted to support a new BBS project. That one has outlived the project. :)
Atreyu wrote to Dumas Walker <=-
I added a third board later because I wanted to support a new BBS project. That one has outlived the project. :)
Ha! Which one was this?
I'm considering moving off of ESXi for home to XCP-NG.
I understand Proxmox seems to be the clear popular alternative, but it also appears to require more baby sitting. Is this true?
I prefer Proxmox in every way. Well... I suppose I shouldn't make that super blankey statement - as a lot of things are the same. I don't do a lof of babysitting AT ALL, w/ PVE.
paulie420 wrote to niter3 <=-
I'm considering moving off of ESXi for home to XCP-NG.
I understand Proxmox seems to be the clear popular alternative, but it also appears to require more baby sitting. Is this true?
I prefer Proxmox in every way. Well... I suppose I shouldn't make that super blankey statement - as a lot of things are the same. I don't do a lof of babysitting AT ALL, w/ PVE.
In fact, PVE [Proxmox] runs all my production VMs without fail and its counterpart, PBS [Proxmox Backup Server] handles all the off-site
backups. Set it up and forget it...
With the ability to add nodes to a PVE cluster, Proxmox begins to show
why its the choice for corporations, schools and productions that use
it to run all their machines - I think you'd like Proxmox if you give
it a whirl. I rely on it.
Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
---|---|
Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
Users: | 91 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 17:05:13 |
Calls: | 5,074 |
Calls today: | 6 |
Files: | 8,491 |
Messages: | 352,924 |
Posted today: | 1 |